Development Assessment Panel

 

Business Paper

 

date of meeting:

 

Wednesday 14 March 2018

location:

 

Function Room

Port Macquarie-Hastings Council

17 Burrawan Street

Port Macquarie

time:

 

2:00pm

 


Development Assessment Panel

 

CHARTER

 


 

 

1.0     OBJECTIVES

 

To assist in managing Council's development assessment function by providing independent and expert determinations of development applications that fall outside of staff delegations.

 

 

2.0     KEY FUNCTIONS

 

·                To review development application reports and conditions;

·                To determine development  applications  outside  of staff delegations;

·                To  refer development  applications to  Council for  determination  where necessary;

·                To provide a forum for objectors and applicants to make submissions on applications before  the Development Assessment Panel (DAP);

·                To maintain transparency in the determination of development applications.

 

Delegated Authority of Panel

 

Pursuant to Section 377 of the Local Government Act, 1993 delegation to:

·                Determine development applications under Part 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 having regard to the relevant environmental planning instruments, development control plans and Council policies.

·                Vary, modify or release restrictions as to use and/or covenants created by Section 88B instruments under the Conveyancing Act 1919 in relation to development applications for subdivisions being considered by the panel.

·                Determine Koala Plans of Management under State Environmental Planning Policy 44 - Koala Habitat Protection associated with development applications being considered by the Panel.

 

Noting the trigger to escalate decision making to Council as highlighted in section 5.2.

 

 

3.0      MEMBERSHIP

 

3.1      Voting Members

 

·                Two independent external members. One of the independent external members to be the Chairperson.

·                Group Manager Development Assessment (alternate - Director Development & Environment or Development Assessment Planner)

 

The independent external members shall have expertise in one or more of the following areas: planning, architecture, heritage, the environment, urban design, economics, traffic and transport, law, engineering, government and public administration.

 

3.2      Non-Voting Members

 

·                Not applicable

3.3      Obligations of members

 

·                Members must act faithfully and diligently and in accordance with    this Charter.

·                Members must comply with Council's Code of Conduct.

·                Except as required to properly perform their duties, DAP members must not disclose any confidential information (as advised by Council) obtained in connection with the DAP functions.

·                Members will have read and be familiar with the documents and information provided by Council prior to attending a DAP                                              meeting.

·                Members must act in accordance with Council's Workplace Health and Safety Policies and Procedures

·                External members of the Panel are not authorised to speak to the media on behalf of Council. Council officers that are members of the Committee are bound by the existing operational delegations in relation to speaking to the media.

·                Staff members shall not vote on matters before the Panel if they have been the principle author of the development assessment report.

 

3.4      Member Tenure

 

·                The independent external members will be appointed for the term of four (4) years maximum in which the end of the tenure of these members would occur in a cascading arrangement.

 

3.5      Appointment of members

 

·                The independent external members (including the Chair) shall be appointed by the General Manager following an external Expression of Interest process.

·                Staff members of the Panel are in accordance with this Charter.

 

 

4.0     TIMETABLE OF MEETINGS

 

·                The Development Assessment Panel will generally meet on the 1st and 3rd Wednesday each month at 2.00pm at the Port Macquarie offices of Council.

·                Special Meetings of the Panel may be convened by the Director Development & Environment Services with three (3) days notice.

 

 

5.0      MEETING PRACTICES

 

5.1      Meeting Format

 

·                At all Meetings of the Panel the Chairperson shall occupy the Chair and preside. The Chair will be responsible for keeping of order at meetings.

·                Meetings shall be open to the   public.

·                The Panel will hear from applicants and objectors or their r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s .

·                Where considered necessary, the Panel will conduct site inspections which will be open to the public.

 

5.2      Decision Making

 

·                Decisions are to be made by consensus. Where consensus is not possible on any item, that item is to be referred to Council for a decision.

·                All development applications involving a proposed variation to a development standard greater than 10% under Clause 4.6 of the Local Environmental Plan will be considered by the Panel and recommendation made to the Council for a decision.

 

5.3      Quorum

 

·                All members (2 independent external members and 1 staff member) must be present at a meeting to form a quorum.

 

5.4      Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson

 

·                Independent Chair (alternate, second independent member)

 

5.5     Secretariat

 

·                The Director Development &n Environment is to be responsible for ensuring that the Panel has adequate secretariat support. The secretariat will ensure that the business paper and supporting papers are circulated at least three (3) days prior to each meeting. Minutes shall be appropriately approved and circulated to each member within three (3) weeks of a meeting being held.

·                The format of and the preparation and publishing of the Business Paper and Minutes shall be similar to the format for Ordinary Council Meetings.

 

5.6      Recording of decisions

 

·                Minutes will record decisions and how each member votes for each item before the Panel.

 

 

6.0     CONVENING OF “OUTCOME SPECIFIC” WORKING GROUPS

 

Not applicable.

 

 

7.0     CONFIDENTIALITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

·                Members of the Panel must comply with the applicable provisions of Council’s Code of Conduct. It is the personal responsibility of members to comply with the standards in the Code of Conduct and regularly review their personal circumstances with this in mind.

·                Panel members must declare any conflict of interests at the start of each meeting or before discussion of a relevant item or topic. Details of any conflicts of interest should be appropriately minuted. Where members are deemed to have a real or perceived conflict of interest, it may be appropriate they be excused from deliberations on the issue where the conflict of interest may exist. A Panel meeting may be postponed where there is no quorum.

 

 

8.0     LOBBYING

 

·                All members and applicants are to adhere to Council’s Lobbying policy. Outside of scheduled Development Assessment Panel meetings, applicants, their representatives, Councillors, Council staff and the general public are not to lobby Panel members via meetings, telephone conversations, correspondence and the like. Adequate opportunity will be provided at Panel inspections or meetings for applicants, their representatives and the general public to make verbal submissions in relation to Business Paper items.


Development Assessment Panel

 

ATTENDANCE REGISTER

 

 

 

Member

22/11/17

06/12/17

13/12/17

14/02/18

28/02/18

Paul Drake

P

P

P

P

 

Robert Hussey

P

P

P

P

       A

David Crofts

(alternate member)

 

 

 

 

P

Dan Croft

(Acting Director Development & Environment)

Clinton Tink

(Acting GM Development Assessment

(alternates)

- Director Development & Environment

- Development Assessment Planner

P

 

P

P

 

P

P

 

P

P

 

P

 

P

 

Key: P =  Present

         A  =  Absent With Apology

         =  Absent Without Apology

 

 

 


Development Assessment Panel Meeting

Wednesday 14 March 2018

 

Items of Business

 

 

Item       Subject                                                                                                      Page

 

01           Acknowledgement of Country............................................................................ 8

02           Apologies......................................................................................................... 8

03           Confirmation of Minutes.................................................................................... 8

04           Disclosures of Interest..................................................................................... 15

05           DA2017 - 1141.1 Dwelling - Lot 271 DP 1234160 No. 64A The Anchorage, Port Macquarie...................................................................................................................... 19

06           DA2017 - 1065.1 Alterations To Caravan Park, Lot 2 DP 1233513, Munster Street, Port Macquarie...................................................................................................................... 43

07           DA2017-1100.1 Dwelling & Swimming Pool, Lot 34 DP 22916, No 12 Surf Street, Port Macquarie...................................................................................................................... 81

08           Section 96 Modification DA2016 - 404.2 Modification to Industry (Cement Depot) - Lot 21 DP 1205839, 39 Randall Street, Wauchope........................................................... 114

09           Section 96 Modification DA2013 - 211.2 - Modification To A Continued Use Of Animal Boarding And Training Establishment (Horse Riding) - Lot 4 DP 1110091, No 334 Crows Road, Frazers Creek............................................................................................................ 155

10           Section 96 Modification DA2010 - 572.11 - Modification Of Subdivision Layout And Dwelling Design (Proposed Lots 213 To 217) - Lot 498 DP 1237901 Crestwood Drive, Port Macquarie...................................................................................................................... 264  

11           General Business

 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

Item:          01

Subject:     ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

 

"I acknowledge that we are gathered on Birpai Land. I pay respect to the Birpai Elders both past and present. I also extend that respect to all other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people present."

 

 

Item:          02

Subject:     APOLOGIES

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the apologies received be accepted.

 

 

Item:          03

Subject:     CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES

Recommendation

That the Minutes of the Development Assessment Panel Meeting held on 28 February 2018 be confirmed.

 


MINUTES

Development Assessment Panel Meeting

                                                                                                                                  28/02/2018

 

 

 

 

PRESENT

 

Members:

Paul Drake

David Crofts

Clinton Tink

 

Other Attendees:

Ben Roberts

Patrick Galbraith-Robertson

Warren Wisemantel

David Troemel

 

 

 

The meeting opened at 2:00pm.

 

 

01       ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

The Acknowledgement of Country was delivered.

 

 

02       APOLOGIES

CONSENSUS:

That the apology received from Robert Hussey be accepted.

 

 

03       CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

CONSENSUS:

That the Minutes of the Development Assessment Panel Meeting held on 14 February 2018 be confirmed.

 

 

04      DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST

 

There were no disclosures of interest presented.

 

 

 

05       DA2017 - 721.1 Manufactured Housing Estate, Manager's Residence And Associated Infrastructure - Lot 2 DP 1224314, Lot 2 DP 1172154 Thrumster Street, Thrumster

Speakers:

Tim Smead (o)

Geraldine Haigh (applicant)

 

CONSENSUS:

 

That DA 2017 – 721.1 for a Manufactured Housing Estate, Manager’s Residence and Associated Infrastructure at Lot 2, DP 1224314 and Lot 2, DP 1172154 Thrumster Street, Thrumster, be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions as amended below:

 

Replace condition F(2) with the following:

 

F2        (E008)Payment to Council of the Section 94 contributions set out in the “Notice of Payment – Developer Charges” schedule attached to this consent, based upon the number of bedrooms in the individual manufactured home/s, unless deferral of payment of contributions has been approved by Council.  The contributions are levied, pursuant to the Area 13 Environmental Land Management Planning Agreement and Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as amended, and in accordance with the provisions of the following plans:

•             Hastings S94 Administration Building Contributions Plan

•             Hastings Administration Levy Contributions Plan

•             Hastings S94 Major Roads Contributions Plan

•             Hastings S94 Open Space Contributions Plan

•             Community Cultural and Emergency Services Contributions Plan 2005

•             S94 Local Roads Contributions Plan - Areas 13, 14 and 15

 

The plans may be viewed during office hours at the Council Chambers located on the corner of Burrawan and Lord Streets, Port Macquarie, 9 Laurie Street, Laurieton, and High Street, Wauchope.

 

The attached “Notice of Payment” is valid for the period specified on the Notice only. The contribution amounts shown on the Notice are subject to adjustment in accordance with CPI increases adjusted quarterly and the provisions of the relevant plans. Payments can only be made using a current “Notice of Payment” form. Where a new Notice of Payment form is required, an application in writing together with the current Notice of Payment application fee is to be submitted to Council.

 

Delete condition B(6).

 

 

 

 

 

Add condition F20 to state:

 

F20      (F195) Prior to occupation or the issue of any certificate of completion of a manufactured home within the estate, a stop sign is to be installed at the intersection of the access road and Thrumster Street.

 

 

06       DA2017 - 871.1 Service Station And Signage - Lot 20 DP 1191370 No. 16 Sancrox Road, Sancrox

Speakers:

Tony Thorne (applicant)

 

CONSENSUS:

 

That DA 2017 – 871.1 for a service station and signage at Lot 20, DP 1191370, No. 16 Sancrox Road, Sancrox, be determined by granting consent subject to recommended conditions as amended below:

 

Amend condition B9 to state:

 

B9        (A195) The provision, at no cost to Council, of a minimum 1.2m wide concrete foot path for the Sancrox Road frontage of Lot 1, between the proposed eastern driveway and the existing concrete footpath on the north-eastern leg of the Orleans Drive roundabout. Design details in accordance with AUSPEC and Council Standard drawing ASD 100 series. The design plans must be approved by Council pursuant to Section 138 of the Roads Act.

 

Amend condition B2 (10) to state:

 

B2(10) Provision of a 1.2m concrete footpath along Sancrox Road for the road frontage of approved Lot 1, between the proposed eastern driveway and the existing concrete footpath on the north-eastern leg of the Orleans Drive roundabout.

 

 

07       DA2017 - 1007.1 Eight Semi-Detached Dwellings With Torrens Title Subdivision  Lots 114,115,116 And 117 DP 1229250, 43 Seaside Drive  And 4-6 Waterside Way Lake Cathie

Speakers:

Eric Ding (o)

James Collins (applicant)

 

CONSENSUS:

 

That DA 2017 - 1007 for eight (8) semi-detached dwellings with torrens title subdivision at Lot 114,115,116 & 117, DP 1229250, No. 43 Seaside Drive & 4-6 Waterside Way, Lake Cathie, be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions as amended below:

 

Add condition A11 to state:

 

A11      (A195) Sewer manholes shall remain in a single lot and shall maintain clearance requirements. Any boundary adjustment shall maintain one metre (1m) clearance from any sewer manhole.

 

Add condition B16 to state:

 

B16      (B195) Prior to release of the Construction Certificate, the front fence for the courtyard to proposed Unit 4 is to be minimised in size so as to create an open space area compliant with the requirements of 3.2.2.6 of Port Macquarie Hastings Development Control Plan 2013 but no greater. The fence is also not to exceed a height of 1.8m above the finished ground level and be consistent with the requirements of 3.2.2.7 of Port Macquarie Hastings Development Control Plan 2013. Plans showing the changes are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority, prior to release of the Construction Certificate.

 

Amend condition A10 to state:

 

(10)      (A007) The development must only proceed in accordance with the approved stages as set out below:

·         Stage 1- Units 1 & 2

·         Stage 2- Units 3 & 4 and boundary adjustment between Lots 115 & 116 DP 1229250

·         Stage 3- Units 5 & 6 and boundary adjustment between Lots 115 & 116 DP 1229250

·         Stage 4 -Units 7 & 8

Unless specified, the conditions of this consent will apply to all stages, with any decision on any discrepancy with conditions and associated staging resting with Council. Any decision to allow a change to staging will rest with Council along with applicable conditions and any contributions payable.

 

 

08       DA2017 - 780.1 Shop Top Housing - Lot 1 DP 536032, No. 4 Hastings River Drive, Port Macquarie

Speakers:

Tony McVeigh (o)

Bill Vogel (o)

Wayne Ellis (applicant)

David Pensini (applicant)

 

CONSENSUS:

 

That DA2017 – 780.1 be deferred to allow the applicant to address the deficiency in parking and how it can be accommodated either onsite or in the area.

 

 

09       DA2017 - 981.1 Ancillary Building (Shed) Lot 2 DP 244961, No 8 Azalea Avenue, Wauchope

Speakers:

Victoria Sheringham (o)

Alex Van Oirschot (applicant)

 

CONSENSUS:

 

That DA 2017 – 981.1 for an ancillary building (shed) at Lot 2, DP 244961, No. 8 Azalea Avenue, Wauchope be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions as amended belw:

 

Add condition B1 to state:

 

B1        (B195) Prior to the release of the Construction Certificate, the plan on page 3 of the Best Sheds plans is to be mirror reversed.

 

Add condition B2 to state:

 

B2        (B196) Prior to release of the Construction Certificate, the shed is to be located 1.5m from the eastern boundary and the area between the shed and fence planted with lilly pilly plant species at 1.5m spacings and allowed to grow to a minimum 2m in height to screen the shed. Plans showing the changes are to be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority, prior to release of the Construction Certificate and the landscaping put in place prior to release of the Occupation Certificate and maintained at all times.

 

 

10       GENERAL BUSINESS

Nil.

 

 

 

The meeting closed at 4:00pm.

 

 

 

 

 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

Item:          04

Subject:     DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Disclosures of Interest be presented

 

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST DECLARATION

 

 

Name of Meeting:     ………………………………………………………………………..

 

Meeting Date:           ………………………………………………………………………..

 

Item Number:            ………………………………………………………………………..

 

Subject:                      ………………………………………………………………………..

                                    …………………………………………………….……………...…..

 

 

I, ..................................................................................... declare the following interest:

 

 

        Pecuniary:

              Take no part in the consideration and voting and be out of sight of the meeting.

 

 

        Non-Pecuniary - Significant Interest:

              Take no part in the consideration and voting and be out of sight of the meeting.

 

        Non-Pecuniary - Less than Significant Interest:

              May participate in consideration and voting.

 

 

For the reason that:  ....................................................................................................

 

.......................................................................................................................................

 

Name:  …………………………………………………….

 

Signed:  .........................................................................  Date:  ..................................

 

 

Growth Bar b&w(Further explanation is provided on the next page)


 

Further Explanation

(Local Government Act and Code of Conduct)

 

A conflict of interest exists where a reasonable and informed person would perceive that a Council official could be influenced by a private interest when carrying out their public duty. Interests can be of two types: pecuniary or non-pecuniary.

 

All interests, whether pecuniary or non-pecuniary are required to be fully disclosed and in writing.

 

Pecuniary Interest

 

A pecuniary interest is an interest that a Council official has in a matter because of a reasonable likelihood or expectation of appreciable financial gain or loss to the Council official. (section 442)

 

A Council official will also be taken to have a pecuniary interest in a matter if that Council official’s spouse or de facto partner or a relative of the Council official or a partner or employer of the Council official, or a company or other body of which the Council official, or a nominee, partner or employer of the Council official is a member, has a pecuniary interest in the matter. (section 443)

 

The Council official must not take part in the consideration or voting on the matter and leave and be out of sight of the meeting.  The Council official must not be present at, or  in sight of, the meeting of the Council at any time during which the matter is being considered or discussed, or at any time during which the council is voting on any question in relation to the matter.  (section 451)

 

Non-Pecuniary

 

A non-pecuniary interest is an interest that is private or personal that the Council official has that does not amount to a pecuniary interest as defined in the Act.

 

Non-pecuniary interests commonly arise out of family, or personal relationships, or involvement in sporting, social or other cultural groups and associations and may include an interest of a financial nature.

 

The political views of a Councillor do not constitute a private interest.

 

The management of a non-pecuniary interest will depend on whether or not it is significant.

 

Non Pecuniary – Significant Interest

As a general rule, a non-pecuniary conflict of interest will be significant where a matter does not raise a pecuniary interest, but it involves:

(a)   A relationship between a Council official and another person that is particularly close, for example, parent, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, lineal descendant or adopted child of the Council official or of the Council official’s spouse, current or former spouse or partner, de facto or other person living in the same household.

(b)   Other relationships that are particularly close, such as friendships and business relationships. Closeness is defined by the nature of the friendship or business relationship, the frequency of contact and the duration of the friendship or relationship.

(c)   An affiliation between a Council official an organisation, sporting body, club, corporation or association that is particularly strong.

 

If a Council official declares a non-pecuniary significant interest it must be managed in one of two ways:

1.     Remove the source of the conflict, by relinquishing or divesting the interest that creates the conflict, or reallocating the conflicting duties to another Council official.

2.     Have no involvement in the matter, by taking no part in the consideration or voting on the matter and leave and be out of sight of the meeting, as if the provisions in section 451(2) apply.

 

Non Pecuniary – Less than Significant Interest

If a Council official has declared a non-pecuniary less than significant interest and it does not require further action, they must provide an explanation of why they consider that the conflict does not require further action in the circumstances.

SPECIAL DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST DECLARATION

 

 

By

[insert full name of councillor]

 

 

In the matter of

[insert name of environmental planning instrument]

 

 

Which is to be considered at a meeting of the

[insert name of meeting]

 

 

Held on

[insert date of meeting]

 

 

PECUNIARY INTEREST

 

 

Address of land in which councillor or an  associated person, company or body has a proprietary interest (the identified land)i

 

 

Relationship of identified land to councillor

[Tick or cross one box.]

 

Councillor has interest in the land (e.g. is owner or has other interest arising out of a mortgage, lease trust, option or contract, or otherwise).

 

Associated person of councillor has interest in the land.

 

Associated company or body of councillor has interest in the land.

 

MATTER GIVING RISE TO PECUNIARY INTEREST

 

 

Nature of land that is subject to a change

in zone/planning control by proposed

LEP (the subject land iii

[Tick or cross one box]

 

The identified land.

 

Land that adjoins or is adjacent to or is in proximity to the identified land.

Current zone/planning control

[Insert name of current planning instrument and identify relevant zone/planning control applying to the subject land]

 

Proposed change of zone/planning control

[Insert name of proposed LEP and identify proposed change of zone/planning control applying to the subject land]

 

Effect of proposed change of zone/planning control on councillor

[Tick or cross one box]

 

Appreciable financial gain.

 

Appreciable financial loss.

 

 

 

Councillor’s Name:  …………………………………………

 

Councillor’s Signature:  ……………………………….   Date:  ………………..


 

 

Important Information

 

This information is being collected for the purpose of making a special disclosure of pecuniary interests under sections 451 (4) and (5) of the Local Government Act 1993.  You must not make a special disclosure that you know or ought reasonably to know is false or misleading in a material particular.  Complaints made about contraventions of these requirements may be referred by the Director-General to the Local Government Pecuniary Interest and Disciplinary Tribunal.

 

This form must be completed by you before the commencement of the council or council committee meeting in respect of which the special disclosure is being made.   The completed form must be tabled at the meeting.  Everyone is entitled to inspect it.  The special disclosure must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i.   Section 443 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993 provides that you may have a pecuniary interest in a matter because of the pecuniary interest of your spouse or your de facto partner or your relativeiv or because your business partner or employer has a pecuniary interest. You may also have a pecuniary interest in a matter because you, your nominee, your business partner or your employer is a member of a company or other body that has a pecuniary interest in the matter.

ii.  Section 442 of the Local Government Act 1993 provides that a pecuniary interest is an interest that a person has in a matter because of a reasonable likelihood or expectation of appreciable financial gain or loss to the person. A person does not have a pecuniary interest in a matter if the interest is so remote or insignificant that it could not reasonably be regarded as likely to influence any decision the person might make in relation to the matter or if the interest is of a kind specified in section 448 of that Act (for example, an interest as an elector or as a ratepayer or person liable to pay a charge).

iii.   A pecuniary interest may arise by way of a change of permissible use of land adjoining, adjacent to or in proximity to land in which a councillor or a person, company or body referred to in section 443 (1) (b) or (c) of the Local Government Act 1993 has a proprietary interest..

iv.   Relative is defined by the Local Government Act 1993 as meaning your, your spouse’s or your de facto partner’s parent, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, lineal descendant or adopted child and the spouse or de facto partner of any of those persons.

 

 

 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

 

 

Item:          05

 

Subject:     DA2017 - 1141.1 Dwelling - Lot 271 DP 1234160 No. 64A The Anchorage, Port Macquarie

Report Author: Stephen Ryan

 

 

 

Applicant:               Coast Building Company Pty Ltd

Owner:                    J D & S A Newton

Estimated Cost:     $747,774

Parcel no:               66915

Alignment with Delivery Program

4.3.1  Undertake transparent and efficient development assessment in accordance with relevant legislation.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That DA2017 – 1141.1 for a dwelling at Lot 271, DP1234160, No. 64A The Anchorage, Port Macquarie, be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions.

 

Executive Summary

 

This report considers a development application for a dwelling at the subject site and provides an assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Following exhibition of the application, one (1) submission has been received.

 

 

1.       BACKGROUND

 

Existing sites features and surrounding development

 

The site has an area of 663.7m2.

 

The site is zoned R1 General Residential in accordance with the Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011, as shown in the following zoning plan:

 

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=b79ab452-85a1-4f27-94d3-9768dd2884c3&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

The existing subdivision pattern and location of existing development within the locality is shown in the following aerial photograph:

 

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=aa0362c8-518a-4f35-913f-a2335af148de&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

2.       DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

 

Key aspects of the proposal include the following:

 

 

·    New two storey dwelling with attached garage.

·    Submission received.

 

Refer to attachments at the end of this report.

 

Application Chronology

 

·    19 December 2017 - Application lodged.

·    12 January 2018 - 25 January 2018 - Exhibition via neighbour notification.

·    25 January 2018 - Submission received.

·    21 February 2018 - Revised plans received relating to glazing changes.

·    27 February 2018 - Email sent to applicant advising of submission.

·    27 February 2018 - Response from applicant.

·    27 February 2018 - Email sent to objector outlining applicant’s response.

 

3.       STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

 

Section 79C(1) Matters for Consideration

 

In determining the application, Council is required to take into consideration the following matters as are relevant to the development that apply to the land to which the development application relates:

 

(a)     The provisions (where applicable) of:

(i)      any Environmental Planning Instrument:

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 - Koala Habitat Protection

There is no Koala Plan of Management on the site. Additionally, the site is less than 1ha in area therefore no further investigations are required.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No.55 – Remediation of Land

Following an inspection of the site and a search of Council records, the subject land is not identified as being potentially contaminated and is suitable for the intended use.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 71 – Coastal Protection and Clause 5.5 of Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011

The site is located within a coastal zone as defined in accordance with clause 4 of SEPP 71.

In accordance with clause 5, this SEPP prevails over the Port Macquarie-Hastings LEP 2011 in the event of any inconsistency.

Having regard to clauses 8 and 12 to 16 of SEPP 71 and clause 5.5 of Hastings LEP 2011 inclusive the proposed development will not result in any of the following:

a)         any restricted access (or opportunities for access) to the coastal foreshore

b)         any identifiable adverse amenity impacts along the coastal foreshore and on the scenic qualities of the coast;

c)         any identifiable adverse impacts on any known flora and fauna (or their natural environment);

d)         subject to any identifiable adverse coastal processes or hazards;

e)         any identifiable conflict between water and land based users of the area;

f)          any identifiable adverse impacts on any items of archaeological/heritage;

g)         reduce the quality of the natural water bodies in the locality.

The site is located within an area zoned and already built out for residential purposes.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

A BASIX certificate (number 891679S) has been submitted demonstrating that the proposal will comply with the requirements of the SEPP. It is recommended that a condition be imposed to ensure that the commitments are incorporated into the development and certified at Occupation Certificate stage.

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011

The proposal is consistent with the LEP having regard to the following:

·     Clause 2.2, the subject site is zoned R1 General Residential. In accordance with clause 2.3(1) and the R1 zone landuse table, the dwelling is a permissible landuse with consent.

The objectives of the R1 zone are as follows:

o To provide for the housing needs of the community.

o To provide for a variety of housing types and densities.

o To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

In accordance with Clause 2.3(2), the proposal is consistent with the zone objectives as it is a permissible landuse and consistent with the established residential locality.

·     Clause 4.3, the maximum overall height of the building above ground level (existing) is 7.95m, which complies with the standard height limit of 8.5m applying to the site.

·     Clause 4.4, the floor space ratio of the proposal is 0.52:1.0, which complies with the maximum 0.65.0:1 floor space ratio applying to the site.

·     Clause 5.10, the site does not contain or adjoin any known heritage items or sites of significance.

·     Clause 7.1, the site is mapped as potentially containing class 3 acid sulphate soils. The proposed development includes excavation for footings & slab, however no excavation extending 1m below the natural surface level is proposed. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected to occur to the acid sulphate soils found on site.

·     Clause 7.3, the site is land within a mapped “flood planning area”. In this regard the following comments are provided which incorporate consideration of the objectives of Clause 7.3, Council’s Flood Policy (2015); the NSW Government’s Flood Prone Lands Policy and the NSW Government’s Floodplain Development Manual (2005):

The proposal is compatible with the flood hazard of the land taking into account projected changes as a result of climate change;

The proposal will not result in a significant adverse effect on flood behaviour that would result in detrimental increases in the potential flood affectation of other development or properties;

The proposal incorporates measures to minimise & manage the flood risk to life and property associated with the use of land;

The proposal is not likely to significantly adversely affect the environment or cause avoidable erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation or a reduction in the stability of river banks or watercourses;

The proposal is not likely to result in unsustainable social and economic costs to the community as a consequence of flooding.

Based on the above, the proposal is considered to comply with Clause 7.3.

·     Clause 7.13, satisfactory arrangements are in place for provision of essential services.

 

(ii)     Any draft instruments that apply to the site or are on exhibition:

 

No draft instruments relevant to the proposal.

 

(iii)    Any Development Control Plan in force:

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Development Control Plan 2013

 

DCP 2013: Dwellings, Dual occupancies, Dwelling houses, Multi dwelling houses & Ancillary development

 

 

Requirements

Proposed

Complies

3.2.2.1

Ancillary development:

4.8m max. height

Single storey

60m2 max. area

24 degree max. roof pitch

Not located in front setback

Pool not part of this application.

N/A

 

3.2.2.2

Articulation zone:

Min. 3m front setback

An entry feature or portico

A balcony, deck, patio, pergola, terrace or verandah

A window box treatment

A bay window or similar feature

An awning or other feature over a window

A sun shading feature

A 3.22m setback is proposed to the front entry portico.

Yes

 

Front setback (Residential not R5 zone):

Min. 4.5m local road or within 20% of adjoining dwelling if on corner lot

 

4.5m to garage and over 4.5m to remainder of the front building line.

Yes

3.2.2.3

Garage 5.5m min. and 1m behind front façade.

Garage door recessed behind building line or eaves/overhangs provided

 

4.5m setback at the minimum (due to angle of the front boundary) but extending to over 5.5m.

No – refer to comments at the end of this table.

 

Driveway crossover 1/3 max. of site frontage and max. 5.0m width

The driveway complies with the 5.0m requirement but occupies more than 1/3 site frontage.

No – refer to comments at the end of this table.

3.2.2.4

4m min. rear setback. Variation subject to site analysis and provision of private open space

>4m setback available

Yes

3.2.2.5

Side setbacks:

Ground floor = min. 0.9m

 

First floors & above = min. 3m setback or where it can be demonstrated that overshadowing not adverse = 0.9m min.

 

Building wall set in and out every 12m by 0.5m

 

 

0.2m garage & 0.9m & 1.5m dwelling.

 

1.5m first floor level.

 

 

 

 

 

Maximum wall length of 15.12m & 14.280m.

 

No – refer to comments at the end of this table.

 

3.2.2.6

35m² min. private open space area including a useable 4x4m min. area which has 5% max. grade

 

Available at rear

Yes

3.2.2.10

Privacy:

Direct views between living areas of adjacent dwellings screened when within 9m radius of any part of window of adjacent dwelling and within 12m of private open space areas of adjacent dwellings. ie. 1.8m fence or privacy screening which has 25% max. openings and is permanently fixed

 

Privacy screen required if floor level > 1m height, window side/rear setback (other than bedroom) is less than 3m and sill height less than 1.5m

1.             

2.             

3.             

4.             

Privacy screens provided to balconies/verandahs etc which have <3m side/rear setback and floor level height >1m

Windows and living areas on ground level either face a public pathway or would be screened via standard 1.8m high fencing.

 

Upper level windows consist of bedrooms ensuite, laundry & rumpus room. In this case, screening is not required to the first floor rumpus, which has a sill height 1.5m.

 

Upper level rear deck open only on north facing side. No adjoining property to north only public pathway. Privacy screen not applicable.

Yes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DCP 2013: General Provisions

 

Requirements

Proposed

Complies

2.7.2.2

Design addresses generic principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design guideline

No adverse concealment or entrapment areas. Site boundary suitably defined. Adequate casual surveillance available.

Yes

2.3.3.1

Cut and fill 1.0m max. 1m outside the perimeter of the external building walls

 

Yes

2.5.3.2

New accesses not permitted from arterial or distributor roads

No new access from arterial or distributor roads

Yes

Driveway crossing/s minimal in number and width including maximising street parking

Single driveway crossover

Yes

2.5.3.3

Parking in accordance with Table 2.5.1.

1 space per single dwelling

Double garage proposed.

Yes

2.5.3.11

Section 94 contributions

Credit exists from lot.

N/A

2.5.3.14

Sealed driveway surfaces unless justified

Sealed driveway proposed.

Yes

2.5.3.15 and 2.5.3.16

Driveway grades first 6m or ‘parking area’ shall be 5% grade with transitions of 2m length

Achieves grades.

Yes

2.5.3.17

Parking areas to be designed to avoid concentrations of water runoff on the surface

Stormwater capable of being managed onsite.

Yes

Vehicle washing facilities – grassed area etc available.

Suitable area exists at the front of the property.

Yes

 

The proposal seeks to vary Development Provision 3.2.2.3

 

The relevant objectives are:

·   To minimise the impact of garages and driveways on the streetscape, on street parking and amenity.

·   To minimise the visual dominance of garages in the streetscape.

 

Having regard for the development provisions and relevant objectives, the variations are considered acceptable for the following reasons:

·   The proposal incorporates a garage built 4.5m extending to over 5.5m from the street boundary.

·   The variation is considered to be consistent with other dwellings in the street and necessitated by the narrow nature of the lot.

·   The front entry portico within the articulation zone and two storey design aims to minimise the visual dominance of the garage on the streetscape.

·   The driveway still contains suitable area for parking a vehicle off street.

·   The lot width at the front boundary is only 10.61m, which makes compliance with the standard difficult.

 

The proposal seeks to vary Development Provision 3.2.2.5

 

The relevant objectives are:

·   To reduce overbearing and perceptions of building bulk on adjoining properties and to maintain privacy.

·   To provide for visual and acoustic privacy between dwellings.

 

Having regard for the development provisions and relevant objectives, the variations are considered acceptable for the following reasons:

 

·   The garage adjoining the boundary is single storey in height and for a length of 8.870m. It will not present as excessive in terms of building bulk to the adjoining property.

·   Zero lot lines for garages are a feature of development in this locality. The proposal remains consistent with such an approach.

·   The variations do not create any visual or acoustic privacy issues.

·   The provision requires first floors to be setback a minimum of 3m. The setback may be reduced down to 900mm where it can be demonstrated that the adjoining property primary living areas and primary private open space areas should not be adversely overshadowed for more than 3hrs between 9am-3pm on 21 June. Overall, the development will not adversely overshadowing living areas on adjoining properties.

·   The variation is considered consistent with the side boundary setbacks of the surrounding dwellings.

·   Private open space is retained at the rear of the lots which will receive adequate solar access as demonstrated by the shadow diagrams provided.

·   The unarticulated wall lengths are only minor variations from the control and will not result in perceptions of excessive building bulk from adjoining properties.

·   The bulk and scale of the development is consistent with development in the locality.

 

(iiia)  any planning agreement that has been entered into under Section 93f or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under Section 93f:

 

No planning agreement has been offered or entered into relating to the site.

 

iv)     any matters prescribed by the Regulations:

 

New South Wales Coastal Policy:

 

The proposed development is consistent with the objectives and strategic actions of this policy.

 

Demolition of buildings AS 2601:

 

N/A

 

v)      any coastal zone management plan (within the meaning of the Coastal Protection Act 1979), that apply to the land to which the development application relates:

 

N/A

 

(b)     The likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, social and economic impacts in the locality:

 

Context and setting

The property is located at the end of a small cul de sac head that comes off The Anchorage. The overall area consists of a canal estate development comprising predominately two storey dwellings of similar bulk and scale.

 

Solar access

The proposal will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts in regard to solar access. Availability in regard to solar access is considered to be consistent with other dwellings in the locality.

5.    

Public domain

The proposal will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts to existing adjoining properties and satisfactorily addresses the public domain. The proposal is also considered to be consistent with other residential development in the locality and adequately addresses planning controls for the area.

6.    

View sharing

There are no adverse impacts on existing view sharing.

7.    

Access, transport and traffic

The proposal will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts in terms access, transport and traffic. The existing road network will satisfactorily cater for any increase in traffic generation as a result of the development.

 

Water Supply

Service available.

 

Sewer

Service available.

 

Stormwater

Service available.

 

Other Utilities

Telecommunication and electricity services are available to the site.

 

Heritage

This site does not contain or adjoin any known heritage item or site of significance.

 

Other land resources

No adverse impacts anticipated. The site is within an established urban context and will not sterilise any significant mineral or agricultural resource.

 

Water cycle

The proposed development will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts on water resources and the water cycle.

 

Soils

The proposed development will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts on soils in terms of quality, erosion, stability and/or productivity subject to a standard condition requiring erosion and sediment controls to be in place prior to and during construction.

 

Air and microclimate

The construction and/or operations of the proposed development will be unlikely to result in any adverse impacts on the existing air quality or result in any pollution.

 

Flora and fauna

Construction of the proposed development will not require any removal/clearing of any significant vegetation and therefore will be unlikely to have any significant adverse impacts on biodiversity or threatened species of flora and fauna.

 

Waste

Satisfactory arrangements are in place for proposed storage and collection of waste and recyclables. No adverse impacts anticipated.

 

Energy

The proposal includes measures to address energy efficiency and will be required to comply with the requirements of BASIX.

 

Noise and vibration

No adverse impacts anticipated. Condition recommended to restrict construction to standard construction hours.

 

Bushfire

The site is not identified as being bushfire prone.

 

Safety, security and crime prevention

The proposed development will be unlikely to create any concealment/entrapment areas or crime spots that would result in any identifiable loss of safety or reduction of security in the immediate area.

 

Social impacts in the locality

Given the nature of the proposed development and its’ location the proposal is unlikely to result in any adverse social impacts.

 

Economic impact in the locality

No adverse impacts. Likely positive impacts can be attributed to the construction of the development and associated flow on effects (i.e. maintained expenditure in the area).

 

Site design and internal design

The proposed development design is satisfactorily responds to the site attributes and will fit into the locality. No adverse impacts likely.

 

Construction

No potential adverse impacts identified to neighbouring properties with the construction of the proposal.

 

Cumulative impacts

The proposed development is not expected to have any adverse cumulative impacts on the natural or built environment or the social and economic attributes of the locality.

 

(c)     The suitability of the site for the development:

 

The proposal will fit into the locality & the site attributes are conductive to the proposed development.

 

(d)     Any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the Regulations:

 

1 (one) written submission was received following public exhibition of the application.

 

Key issues raised in the submission received and comments in response to these issues are provided as follows:

 

Submission Issue/Summary

Planning Comment/Response

 

The use of colorbond steel on the roof & wall cladding is inconsistent with the adjoining rendered & timber clad dwellings.

 

The use of colorbond material for roofing & cladding is not out of character with the varied designs and colour schemes of dwellings within the locality. Furthermore, changes to cladding and colour schemes can be done as exempt development, limiting Councils involvement in such an issue.

 

Colorbond steel may be inconsistent with the restrictions under the 88B.

 

The development is consistent with the relevant 88B instrument applying to the site. It should also be noted that Council does not enforce any private restrictions placed on an 88B instrument by the developer.

 

Colorbond steel may not comply with the North Harbour subdivision building control memorandum.

 

The development is consistent with the relevant Memorandums that Council is a party too. It should also be noted that Council does not enforce any private Memorandums established by the developer.

 

Roof covering & external cladding should not cause glare.

 

Council controls do not specify colour or glare requirements. In particular, changes to the colour of a building can be done as exempt development. Nonetheless, the applicant has indicated that the colorbond colour ‘Surfmist Matt’ was chosen due to its anti-glare properties.

 

(e)     The Public Interest:

 

The proposed development satisfies relevant planning controls and is unlikely to impact on the wider public interest.

 

 

4.       DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS APPLICABLE

 

Not applicable.

 

5.       CONCLUSION

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Issues raised during assessment and public exhibition of the application have been considered in the assessment of the application. Where relevant, conditions have been recommended to manage the impacts attributed to these issues.

 

The site is suitable for the proposed development, is not contrary to the public's interest and will not have a significant adverse social, environmental or economic impact. It is recommended that the application be approved, subject to the recommended conditions of consent provided in the attachment section of this report.

 

 

Attachments

 

1View. DA2017 - 1141.1 Plans

2View. DA2017 - 1141.1 Recommended Conditions

3View. DA2017 - 1141.1 Submission - Jeffrey

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

 

 

Item:          06

 

Subject:     DA2017 - 1065.1 Alterations To Caravan Park, Lot 2 DP 1233513, Munster Street, Port Macquarie

Report Author: Chris Gardiner

 

 

 

Applicant:               Love Project Management

Owner:                    NSW Trade & Investment – Crown Lands

Estimated Cost:     $15,000

Parcel no:               66972

Alignment with Delivery Program

4.3.1  Undertake transparent and efficient development assessment in accordance with relevant legislation.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That DA 2017 – 1065.1 for Alterations to Caravan Park at Lot 2, DP 1233513, Munster Street, Port Macquarie, be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions.

 

Executive Summary

 

This report considers a development application for alterations to a caravan park at the subject site and provides an assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Following exhibition of the application, 3 submissions have been received.

 

 

1.       BACKGROUND

 

Existing sites features and surrounding development

 

The site has an area of 8.195 hectares.

 

The site is zoned RE1 Public Recreation in accordance with the Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011, as shown in the following zoning plan:

 

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=38708ceb-9f8b-471e-941d-e569c18364ad&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

The existing subdivision pattern and location of existing development within the locality is shown in the following aerial photograph:

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=d788b9da-791e-4578-b1ce-7462b2cb38fe&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

2.       DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

 

Key aspects of the proposal include the following:

 

·    Demolition of existing structures;

·    Change to the number and configuration of sites from 2 long term sites, 363 short term sites and 100 camp sites to zero long term sites, 330 short term sites and 100 campsites (overall reduction of 35 sites).

 

Refer to attachments at the end of this report.

 

Application Chronology

 

·    27 November 2017 – Application lodged.

·    12 December 2017 to 12 January 2018 – Neighbour notification.

·    12 December 2017 – Additional information requested by Council staff.

·    17 December 2017 – Additional information provided by Applicant.

·    17 January 2018 – Further additional information requested by Council staff.

·    25 January 2018 and 1 March 2018 – Further additional information submitted by Applicant.

 

3.       STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

 

Section 79C(1) Matters for Consideration

 

In determining the application, Council is required to take into consideration the following matters as are relevant to the development that apply to the land to which the development application relates:

 

(a)     The provisions (where applicable) of:

(i)      any Environmental Planning Instrument:

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 21 - Caravan Parks

 

8   Development consent required for caravan parks

(1)  Development for the purposes of a caravan park may be carried out only with the development consent of the Council.

(2)  Before granting development consent to the use of land for the purposes of a caravan park, a Council must determine:

(a)  the number of sites (if any) within that land that the Council considers are suitable for long-term residence, within the meaning of the Local Government (Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds) Transitional Regulation 1993, and

(b)  the number of sites (if any) within that land that the Council considers are not suitable for long-term residence, but are suitable for short-term residence, within the meaning of that Regulation.

(3)  A Council must not grant development consent to the use of land for the purposes of a caravan park unless it imposes as a condition of that consent a condition specifying the maximum number of sites (if any) within that land that may be used for long-term residence.

(4)  The holder of an approval under Part 1 of Chapter 7 of the Local Government Act 1993 to operate a caravan park or camping ground on land must not, without the development consent of the Council, allow a person to occupy a site within that land:

(a)  for a continuous period of more than 3 months, except as provided by paragraph (b), or

(b)  for a continuous period longer than the period (if any) for which the person is allowed to be accommodated within the land by an extension that has been granted under clause 19 (6) of the Local Government (Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds) Transitional Regulation 1993, if such a use of that site was not lawful under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 when this Policy commenced.

(4A)  Except as provided by subclause (4), nothing in this Policy or any other environmental planning instrument requires separate development consent to be obtained for the installation or placement of a moveable dwelling on land on which development for the purposes of a caravan park is being lawfully carried out.

(5)  This clause does not apply to any land that is authorised to be used for the purposes of a manufactured home estate by a development consent granted pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No 36—Manufactured Home Estates or dedicated or reserved under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974.

 

The proposal does not seek consent for any long-term sites.

 

10   Matters to be considered by Councils

A Council may grant a development consent required by this Policy only after it has considered the following:

(a)     whether, because of its location or character, the land concerned is particularly suitable for use as a caravan park for tourists or for long-term residence,

 

Comment: The land concerned is already used as a caravan park for tourists and for long-term residence.

 

(b)      whether there is adequate provision for tourist accommodation in the locality of that land, and whether existing or potential tourist accommodation will be displaced by the use of sites for long-term residence,

 

Comment: The site is located near the Town Beach and Town Centre precincts, where there is a substantial amount of tourist accommodation. The proposal does not include any long-term sites.

 

(c)      whether there is adequate low-cost housing, or land available for low-cost housing, in that locality,

 

Comment: The proposal would retain existing short-term, low-cost housing opportunities at the site.

 

(d)     whether necessary community facilities and services are available within the caravan park to which the development application relates or in the locality (or both), and whether those facilities and services are reasonably accessible to the occupants of the caravan park,

 

Comment: The development would not result in any reduction in the community facilities within the caravan park. The site is within walking distance of the Port Macquarie Town Centre, which has a range of facilities and services for residents/tourists.

 

(e)     any relevant guidelines issued by the Director, and

 

Comment: No relevant guidelines have been issued.

 

(f)      the provisions of the Local Government (Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds) Transitional Regulation 1993.

 

Comment: The below table considers the applicable provisions of the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.

 

CLAUSE

REQUIREMENT

COMMENT/COMPLIANCE

Part 3, Division 1 Operation of caravan parks and camping grounds

71 Factors for consideration before approval is granted

(1) Council must be satisfied that the estate will be designed in accordance with Division 3; and

(2) Council must have regard to the Floodplain Development Manual.

(1) Yes - refer to comments on Division 3

 

(2) Site is flood prone. See comments under clauses 7.3 and 7.4 of LEP.

72 Matters to be specified in approval

Any approval must specify the number, size and location of the dwelling and camping sites.

Section 68 approval to operate will need to specify these matters.

73 Conditions of approval

The consent must be conditioned to ensure the design, construction, maintenance and operation of the estate is in accordance with Division 3.

Section 68 approval to operate will need to specify these matters.

Part 3, Division 3 Caravan parks and camping grounds

83 Minimum size of caravan park or camping ground

Estate must have an area of not less than 1 hectare.

Complies - site has an area of 8.195 hectares.

84 Community amenities

Minimum 10% of site area to be reserved for recreation and other communal activities

Complies - more than 10% of site area available for recreation and communal activities.

85 Size of dwelling sites and camp sites

(1)  A long-term site must have an area of at least 80 square metres.

(2)  A short-term site must have an area of at least 65 square metres.

(3)  A camp site must have an area of at least:

(a)  40 square metres, in the case of a camp site for which a separate parking space is provided within 30 metres of the camp site, or

(b)  50 square metres, in any other case.

Capable of complying. The proposal includes 330 short-term sites within the same area that has previously been approved for 2 long-term sites and 363 short-term sites. The overall area of the individual sites would therefore be expected to increase. Details of compliant site sizes will need to be submitted with the Section 68 application.

 

The proposal does not include any changes to the existing 100 camp sites.

86 Site identification

Dwelling sites to be identified and site boundaries delineated.

Capable of complying. Would need to be in place prior to Section 68 approval to operate.

87 Dwelling sites to have road frontage

A dwelling site must have vehicular access to an access road.

All dwelling sites have existing vehicular access to an access road.

88 Setbacks of community buildings

(1)  A community building must not be located closer than 10 metres to the boundary of a caravan park or camping ground, or to the boundary of a dwelling site or camp site, unless the approval for the caravan park or camping ground so allows.

(2)  The approval for a caravan park or camping ground must not allow a lesser distance than 10 metres unless the council is satisfied that the community building has been or will be properly screened, fenced, enclosed or otherwise treated.

(3)  A community building must not in any case be located closer than 3 metres to the boundary of a caravan park or camping ground or 5 metres to the boundary of a dwelling site or camp site.

N/A. No new community buildings proposed or required.

89 Setbacks of dwelling sites and camp sites from road frontages

(1)  A dwelling site or camp site must not be located closer than 10 metres to a public road or 3 metres to any other boundary of the caravan park or camping ground unless the approval for the caravan park or camping ground so allows.

(2)  The approval for a caravan park or camping ground must not allow a lesser distance unless the council is satisfied that the dwelling site or camp site has been or will be properly screened, fenced, enclosed or otherwise treated.

Proposed reconfigured sites comply with road and boundary setback requirements.

90 Use of buffer zones

Nothing in this Regulation prevents land within a buffer zone arising from the setbacks required by this Division from being used:

(a)  for community amenities, access roads, car parking spaces, footpaths or landscaping, or

(b)  for any similar purpose allowed by the approval for the caravan park or camping ground.

N/A

91 Separation distances

(1)  A moveable dwelling must not be installed closer to any other moveable dwelling than:

(a)  3 metres, if it is situated on a long-term site, or

(b)  2.5 metres, if it is situated on a short-term site or camp site.

(2)  This clause does not prohibit the installation of semi-detached relocatable homes on adjoining dwelling sites so long as they are separated by construction conforming to the fire safety and sound insulation provisions relating to class 1 buildings contained in Section 3.7.1 and 3.8.6 of Volume Two of the Building Code of Australia.

Capable of complying.

92 Entrance and exit roads

(1)  A road that forms an entrance to or exit from a caravan park or camping ground must be at least 7 metres wide.

(2)  In the case of a divided road, the width of the sealed portion of the road on either side of the median strip must be at least 5 metres.

(3)  The arrangement for the width of an entrance or exit road to taper into or meet the width of the sealed portion of the access roads leading to the entrance or exit must be as specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground.

Site has existing approved entrance and exit roads.

93 Forecourt

A caravan park must have a forecourt, measuring at least 4 metres by 20 metres, to accommodate incoming vehicles.

Existing forecourt.

94 Width of roads

(1)  The width of an access road must be:

(a)  at least 6 metres for a two-way access road, and

(b)  at least 4 metres for a one-way access road.

(2)  The direction of travel for a one-way access road must be indicated by means of conspicuous signs.

Existing approved internal road network.

95 Speed limits

The speed limit applicable to an access road:

(a)  must not exceed 15 kilometres per hour, and

(b)  must be indicated by means of conspicuous signs.

Existing speed limit within the caravan park.

96 Resident parking

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must contain at least one resident parking space for each dwelling site or camp site.

(2)  The parking space for a dwelling site or camp site may be on-site (that is, forming part of the site) or off-site (that is, not forming part of the site).

(3)  An off-site space must be marked (for example, by means of line marking, marker pegs or similar means) to identify the particular dwelling site or camp site to which it relates.

(4)  An off-site parking space for a dwelling site or camp site must be situated in the location specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground.

(5)  Each off-site parking space is to have, at minimum, dimensions of:

(a)  5.4 metres by 2.5 metres, in the case of angle parking, and

(b)  6.1 metres by 2.5 metres, in any other case.

The proposed new studio sites (1A – 8A and 1B – 3B) have one parking space per dwelling site. Spaces 5A – 8A are located off the sites and will need to be marked and allocated accordingly.

 

Existing reconfigured short-term and camp sites would retain one parking space on each site.

 

Parking spaces are capable of complying with the minimum dimensions.

97 Visitor parking

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must contain no fewer visitor parking spaces than the following:

(a)  one visitor parking space for each 10 (and any remaining fraction of 10) long-term sites in the caravan park or camping ground,

(b)  one visitor parking space for each 20 (and any remaining fraction of 20) short-term sites in the caravan park or camping ground,

(c)  one visitor parking space for each 40 (and any remaining fraction of 40) camp sites in the caravan park or camping ground.

(2)  The minimum number of visitor parking spaces to be provided is 4.

The proposed development would result in an overall reduction of 2 long-term sites and 33 short-term sites and would reduce the existing demand for visitor parking.

98 Visitor parking for people with disabilities

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must contain at least one visitor parking space for people with disabilities.

(2)  A caravan park or camping ground that contains more than 100 sites must contain at least one visitor parking space for people with disabilities for each 100 sites or fraction of 100 sites.

(3)  Such parking is to be provided in accordance with AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 Parking facilities—Off street parking.

(4)  Visitor parking spaces for people with disabilities must be clearly identified as such.

(5)  Visitor parking spaces provided under this clause may be counted for the purposes of clause 97.

The proposed development would result in an overall reduction of 2 long-term sites and 33 short-term sites and would reduce the existing demand for visitor parking.

 

A parking space for people with disabilities is proposed for site 1B, which will be an accessible unit.

99 Road surfaces

All access roads, including all passing and parking bays, must have an all-weather sealed or other surface finish specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground, and must be adapted to the topography to allow for adequate drainage and to eliminate excessive grades.

Conditions recommended requiring sealed surface for new parking areas.

100 Lighting

All access roads must be adequately lit between sunset and sunrise.

Existing lighting of roadways. No changes proposed.

101 Water supply

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground:

(a)  must be connected to a mains water supply, or

(b)  must be provided with an alternative water supply service as specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground.

(2)  A dwelling site must be connected to the water supply service for the caravan park or camping ground.

(5)  The water supply service must comply with:

(a)  the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011 and any regulations under that Act, and

(b)  the requirements of any relevant statutory body.

Connection to water service will be required for each proposed site. Condition recommended requiring connection prior to the issue of a Section 68 approval to operate.

102 Sewerage

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground:

(a)  must be connected to a main sewer, or

(b)  must be provided with an alternative sewage disposal system as specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground.

(2)  A long-term site must be provided with a connection to the sewage disposal system for the caravan park or camping ground.

(3)  A caravan park or camping ground that includes any short-term sites or camp sites must be provided with at least one common soil waste dump point for the disposal of closet waste from caravan holding tanks and the like. The common soil waste dump point must be located so as to permit adequate access by caravans and campervans.

(4)  A short-term site must be provided with a disposal point, as specified in the approval, for the disposal of sullage (that is, domestic waste from baths, basins, showers, laundries and kitchens, including floor wastes from those sources) from any moveable dwelling installed on the site. More than one short-term site may be provided with the same disposal point.

(5)  The sewage disposal system must comply with:

(a)  the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011 and any regulations under that Act, and

(b)  the requirements of any relevant statutory body.

Connection to sewer will be required for each site. Condition recommended requiring connection prior to the issue of a Section 68 approval to operate.

103 Drainage

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must be provided with a stormwater drainage system.

(2)  All dwelling sites and camp sites must be adequately drained.

See comments later in this report under Stormwater.

104 Electricity Supply

(1)  A dwelling site must be supplied with electricity from a reticulated electricity service.

(2)  In the case of a long-term site, the electricity must be supplied by means of an electrical circuit connected to a separate electricity meter.

Electricity supply will need to be provided prior to the Section 68 approval to operate.

105 Common trenches

A common trench may be used for the installation of services in accordance with guidelines set out in AMCORD.

Noted.

106 Modification of calculations

In calculating the facilities to be provided in accordance with this Subdivision:

(a)  2 camp sites are taken to be the equivalent of one dwelling site, and

(b)  dwelling sites reserved for use by self-contained moveable dwellings, and dwelling sites provided with ensuite facilities, are to be disregarded.

Noted. See calculations below under clauses 107-109.

107 Number of showers and toilets to be provided.

Facilities to be provided in accordance with table.

N/A. The number of dwelling sites would not be increased by the proposal.

108 Facilities for people with disabilities

Minimum one facility required. Can be disregarded if all sites proposed to be designated for self-contained moveable dwellings.

The proposal would not increase the number of dwelling and camping sites.

109 Other facilities

(1)  All showers and handbasins required by this Subdivision must be supplied with hot and cold running water.

(2)  A mirror must be provided:

(a)  for each handbasin provided, or

(b)  if 2 or more handbasins are provided together, for each pair of handbasins.

(3)  Means for sanitary napkin disposal must be provided in each communal facility that contains water closets for female use and, in a facility containing 10 or more water closets, must be provided at the rate of one for each 10 (or remaining fraction of 10) water closets.

N/A

110 Construction of shower blocks and toilet blocks

(1)  Except as otherwise provided by the approval for the caravan park or camping ground, the shower and toilet facilities provided for a caravan park or camping ground must be housed in a shower block or toilet block:

(a)  that is constructed of brick or concrete masonry block, and

(b)  that has a non-slip floor of tile or other impervious material adequately drained to outlets, and

(c)  that has smooth, hard, durable and water-resistant interior finishes, and

(d)  that has shower recesses with tile or other impervious finishes to a height of at least 1.8 metres, and

(e)  that has tile or other impervious skirtings around water closet cubicle walls, and

(f)  that has tile or other impervious finish around wash basins, and

(g)  that has adequate lighting (both inside and outside) and adequate ventilation at all times, and

(h)  that has all its walls, ceilings and floors, fixtures, fittings and appliances maintained in a clean and sanitary condition at all times.

(2)  Subject to clause 108 (2) and (3), if male and female shower or toilet facilities are located in the same building, that building must be divided for separate use by each sex.

(3)  Water closets must be provided in individual cubicles having a minimum floor area of 1.1 square metres and a minimum width of 0.8 metre.

N/A

111 Proximity of dwelling sites to shower blocks and toilet blocks

(1)  A long-term site must not be situated more than 75 metres (measured in a straight line) from a shower block or toilet block.

(2)  A short-term site or camp site must not be situated more than 100 metres (measured in a straight line) from a shower block or toilet block.

(3)  This clause does not apply in respect of dwelling sites reserved for use by self-contained moveable dwellings and dwelling sites provided with ensuite facilities.

New/reconfigured short-term sites are located within 100m of the existing amenity buildings.

 

113 Washing Machines

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must be provided with:

(a)  at least one washing machine for each 25 (and any remaining fraction of 25 greater than 12) long-term sites, and

(b)  at least one washing machine for each 30 (and any remaining fraction of 30 greater than 15) short-term sites.

(2)  The minimum number of washing machines to be provided is 2.

Proposal would not increase the number of washing machines required as there is a reduction in the overall number of sites.

114 Laundry Tubs

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must be provided with:

(a)  at least one laundry tub for each 50 (and any remaining fraction of 50) long-term sites, and

(b)  at least one laundry tub for each 60 (and any remaining fraction of 60) short-term sites.

(2)  The minimum number of laundry tubs to be provided is one.

Proposal would not increase the number of laundry tubs required as there is a reduction in the overall number of sites.

115 Clothes dryers

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must be provided with:

(a)  at least one mechanical clothes dryer for each 60 (and any remaining fraction of 60 greater than 30) long-term sites, and

(b)  at least one mechanical clothes dryer for each 80 (and any remaining fraction of 80 greater than 40) short-term sites.

(2)  The minimum number of mechanical clothes dryers to be provided is one.

Proposal would not increase the number of mechanical clothes dryers required as there is a reduction in the overall number of sites.

116 Drying area

(1)  A caravan park or camping ground must be provided with clothes line space at the rate of 2 metres of line for each dwelling site.

(2)  The minimum length of clothes line space to be provided is 50 metres.

No increase in number of dwelling sites proposed. Additional clothes line space not required.

117 Water supply

Washing machines and laundry tubs required by this Subdivision must be supplied with both hot and cold water.

Noted. This would need to be confirmed prior to the issue of a Section 68 approval to operate.

118 Ironing facilities

A caravan park or camping ground must be provided with ironing boards, electric irons and power points available for connection to electric irons at the rate of one for every 60 (or remaining fraction of 60) short-term sites.

None required. No short-term sites proposed.

119 Construction of laundry blocks

Except as otherwise provided by the approval for the caravan park or camping ground, the laundry facilities provided for a caravan park or camping ground must be housed in a laundry block:

(a)  that is constructed of brick or concrete masonry block, and

(b)  that has a non-slip floor of tile or other impervious material adequately drained to outlets, and

(c)  that has smooth, hard, durable and water-resistant interior finishes, and

(d)  that has adequate lighting (both inside and outside) and adequate ventilation at all times, and

(e)  that has all its walls, ceilings and floors, fixtures, fittings and appliances maintained in a clean and sanitary condition at all times.

N/A. Existing building.

120 Maintenance

The laundry facilities required by this Subdivision that are housed in a laundry block must be maintained in a serviceable and safe condition.

Noted. This will be a requirement of the Section 68 approval to operate.

127 Garbage removal

Arrangements specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground must be instituted and maintained for the removal of garbage and for the maintenance of garbage receptacles in a clean and sanitary condition.

No changes proposed to existing waste management for the premises.

128 Fire hydrants

(1)  No part of a dwelling site, camp site or community building within a caravan park or camping ground may be situated more than 90 metres from a fire hydrant.

(2)  Any fire hydrant located within a caravan park or camping ground must:

(a)  be a double-headed pillar-type fire hydrant, and

(b)  be maintained to the standard specified in the approval for the caravan park or camping ground.

No changes to existing hydrant coverage of the sites.

129 Fire hose reels

(1)  Fire hose reels must be installed so that each dwelling site or camp site in the caravan park or camping ground can be reached by a fire hose.

(2)  The fire hose reels must be constructed in accordance with AS/NZS 1221:1997, Fire hose reels and installed in accordance with AS 2441—1988, Installation of fire hose reels, as in force on 1 September 2005.

Submitted plans show fire hose reels.

130 Car washing bay

A caravan park must be provided with an area for use for washing vehicles.

No change to existing arrangements.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 - Koala Habitat Protection

 

With reference to clauses 6 and 7, the subject land is greater than 1 hectare (including any adjoining land under same ownership) and therefore the provisions of SEPP must be considered.

 

Schedule 2 Koala feed trees do not make up more than 15% of the canopy or understorey vegetation on the site and it therefore doesn’t constitute potential koala habitat. No further consideration of the SEPP is required.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land

 

Following an inspection of the site and a search of Council records, the subject land is not identified as being potentially contaminated and is suitable for the intended use.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 62 – Sustainable Aquaculture

 

Given the nature of the proposed development and proposed stormwater controls the proposal will be unlikely to have any adverse impact on existing aquaculture industries.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 71 – Coastal Protection and Clause 5.5 of Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011

 

The site is located within a coastal zone noting clause 4 of the SEPP.

 

In accordance with clause 5, this SEPP prevails over the Port Macquarie-Hastings LEP 2011 in the event of any inconsistency.

 

Having regard for clauses 2, 8 and 12 to 16 of the SEPP and clause 5.5 of the PMH LEP 2011, the proposed development will not result in any of the following:

a)   any restricted access (or opportunities for access) to the foreshore

b)   any adverse amenity impacts along the foreshore and on the scenic qualities of the coast;

c)   any adverse impacts on flora and fauna;

d)   the development being subject to any adverse coastal processes or hazards;

e)   any significant conflict between water and land based users of the area;

f)    any adverse impacts on any items of archaeological/heritage;

g)   reduction in the quality of the natural water bodies in the locality (due to effluent & stormwater disposal, construction impacts, landuse conflicts);

h)   adverse cumulative impacts on the environment;

i)    a form of development that is unsustainable  in water and energy demands;

j)    development relying on flexible zone provisions.

 

The site is predominately cleared and located within an area zoned for recreational purposes.

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011

 

The proposal is consistent with the LEP having regard to the following:

·    Clause 2.2, the subject site is zoned RE1 Public Recreation. In accordance with clause 2.3(1) and the RE1 zone landuse table, the proposed development for a caravan park is a permissible landuse with consent.

 

The objectives of the RE1 zone are as follows:

To enable land to be used for public open space or recreational purposes.

To provide a range of recreational settings and activities and compatible land uses.

To protect and enhance the natural environment for recreational purposes.

 

In accordance with Clause 2.3(2), the proposal is consistent with the zone objectives having regard to the following:

The proposal is a permissible landuse;

The development would retain a use that is compatible with recreational activities.

 

·    Clause 2.7, the demolition requires consent as it does not fit within the provisions of SEPP (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008.

 

·    Clause 5.5 - Development within the coastal zone - relevant objectives of this clause are addressed by SEPP 71 section (see above). Climate Change & Coastal Hazard implications addressed under Clause 7.3 & 7.4 below.

·                      

·    Clause 5.10 – Heritage. Part of the southern side of the site is mapped as being of potential archaeological significance (A111 – Archaeology of early European settlement). The works proposed in the application do not include any excavation on this part of the site and referral to the Heritage Council is not required.

·                      

·    Clause 7.1, the site is mapped as potentially containing class 3 acid sulphate soils. The proposed development does not involve any excavation extending 1m or more below the natural surface level. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected to occur to the acid sulphate soils found on site.

·                      

·    Clause 7.3, the site is land within a mapped “flood planning area” (land subject to flood discharge of 1:100 annual recurrence interval flood event, plus the applicable climate change allowance and relevant freeboard). In this regard the following comments are provided which incorporate consideration of the objectives of Clause 7.3, Council’s Flood Policy 2015, the NSW Government’s Flood Prone Lands Policy and the NSW Government’s Floodplain Development Manual (2005):

The proposal is compatible with the flood hazard of the land taking into account projected changes as a result of climate change;

The proposal will not result in a significant adverse effect on flood behaviour that would result in detrimental increases in the potential flood affectation of other development or properties;

The proposal incorporates measures to minimise & manage the flood risk to life and property associated with the use of land;

The proposal is not likely to significantly adversely affect the environment or cause avoidable erosion, siltation, destruction of riparian vegetation or a reduction in the stability of river banks or watercourses;

The proposal is not likely to result in unsustainable social and economic costs to the community as a consequence of flooding;

Minimum floor levels for habitable buildings are recommended in the conditions;

Buildings will be required to be engineered to withstand flood forces and to minimise impacts on the movement of flood waters.

 

·    Clause 7.4 – Flood risk management – the site includes land between the flood planning area and the line that is shown as the probable maximum flood level on the Flood Planning Map. The site is an existing caravan park and has a previous flood evacuation plan that has been accepted by Council. The proposed development would result in a reduction in the overall number of sites by 35 sites and would therefore reduce the number of people at risk during evacuation.

 

·    Clause 7.13, satisfactory arrangements are in place for provision of essential services including water supply, electricity supply, sewer infrastructure, stormwater drainage and suitable road access to service the development.

 

(ii)     Any draft instruments that apply to the site or are on exhibition:

 

Draft State Environmental Planning Policy (Coastal Management) 2016

 

The Draft SEPP was publicly exhibited between 11 November 2016 and 20 January 2017 and is intended to consolidate and replace SEPP 14 (Coastal Wetlands), SEPP 26 (Littoral Rainforests) and SEPP 71 (Coastal Protection).

 

The proposal is considered to be consistent with the provisions of the Draft SEPP, which are generally the same as those discussed under SEPP No. 71 – Coastal Protection earlier in this report.

 

(iii)    any Development Control Plan in force:

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Development Control Plan 2013

 

DCP 2013: General Provisions

 

Requirements

Proposed

Complies

2.7.2.2

Design addresses generic principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design guideline

The proposed development will be unlikely to create any concealment/entrapment areas or crime spots that would result in any identifiable loss of safety or reduction of security in the immediate area.

Yes

2.3.3.8

Removal of hollow bearing trees

None proposed to be removed.

Yes

2.6.3.1

Tree removal (3m or higher with 100mm diameter trunk at 1m above ground level and 3m from external wall of existing dwelling)

None proposed to be removed.

Yes

2.4.3

Bushfire risk, Acid sulphate soils, Flooding, Contamination, Airspace protection, Noise and Stormwater

Refer to main body of report.

 

2.5.3.3

Parking in accordance with Table 2.5.1.

1 space per single dwelling (behind building line)

See comments earlier under SEPP No. 21 regarding parking requirements.

 

2.5.3.11

Section 94 contributions

Refer to main body of report.

 

 

 

(iiia)  any planning agreement that has been entered into under Section 93f or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under Section 93f:

 

No planning agreement has been offered or entered into relating to the site.

 

iv)     any matters prescribed by the Regulations:

 

New South Wales Coastal Policy:

 

The proposed development is consistent with the objectives and strategic actions of this policy. See comments earlier under SEPP No. 71 – Coastal Protection.

 

Demolition of buildings AS 2601:

 

Demolition of existing buildings on the site is capable of compliance with this Australian Standard and is recommended to be conditioned.

 

v)      any coastal zone management plan (within the meaning of the Coastal Protection Act 1979), that apply to the land to which the development application relates:

 

No Coastal Zone Management Plan applies to the subject site.

 

(b)     The likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, social and economic impacts in the locality:

 

The site has a general southerly street frontage orientation to Munster Street and a partial frontage to Murray Street and Sunset Parade.

 

Adjoining the site to the north and west is the Hastings River breakwall and foreshore.

 

Adjoining the site to the east is the Town Beach reserve.

 

Adjoining the site to the south are higher density residential and tourist accommodation and a mix of commercial uses.

 

The proposal is considered to be compatible with other development in the locality and adequately addresses planning controls for the area.

 

The proposal does not have a significant adverse impact on existing view sharing.

 

The proposal does not have significant adverse lighting impacts.

 

There is no adverse overshadowing impacts. The proposal does not prevent adjoining properties from receiving 3 hours of sunlight to private open space and primary living areas on 21 June.

 

Roads

The site has road frontage to Munster Street. Adjacent to the site, Munster Street is a sealed public road under the care and control of Council.

 

Traffic and Transport

The site is currently approved for 2 long-term sites, 363 short-term sites, and 100 camp sites. This development proposes to reduce the overall number of sites to 330 short-term sites and 100 camp sites and would result in a reduction in the existing traffic generation. The traffic associated with the development is unlikely to have any adverse impacts to the existing road network within the immediate locality.

 

Site Frontage & Access

Vehicle access to the site is proposed through the existing driveway off the northern end of Munster Street. No changes to the existing access or site frontage works are proposed.

 

Parking and Manoeuvring

Parking and internal road widths on site can comply with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005 and conditions have been imposed to reflect these requirements.

 

Water Supply Connection

Extension of the internal water supply infrastructure will be required to service the new/reconfigured sites in accordance with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.

 

Detailed plans will be required to be submitted for assessment with the S.68 application.

 

Refer to relevant conditions of consent.

 

Sewer Connection

Extension of the internal sewerage infrastructure will be required to service the new/reconfigured sites in accordance with the Local Government (Manufactured Home Estates, Caravan Parks, Camping Grounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 2005.

 

Detailed plans will be required to be submitted for assessment with the S.68 application.

 

Refer to relevant conditions of consent.

 

Stormwater

The site naturally grades towards the Hastings River and stormwater from individual sites is generally discharged to concrete dish drains along the internal road network. The road network drains to a series of pits along the northern boundary of the site, which discharge through the breakwall to the Hastings River.

 

A detailed site stormwater management plan will be required to be submitted for assessment with the S.68 application and prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate.

 

In accordance with Councils AUSPEC requirements, the following will be required to be incorporated into the stormwater drainage plan:

a)   The legal point of discharge for the proposed development is defined as the existing stormwater drainage system. New roof and pavement areas shall be drained by a direct piped connection to existing drainage wherever practicable.

b)  The design shall provide details of any components of the existing stormwater drainage system servicing the site that are to be retained. The capacity of the downstream system for all storms up to 1 in 5 year Average Recurrence Interval will need to be demonstrated and if capacity is inadequate options may include pipe upgrade and/or onsite detention.

 

Overall, stormwater is able to be managed onsite with conditions of consent applied to manage the detailed design.

 

Other Utilities

Telecommunication and electricity services are available to the site.

 

Heritage

See comments earlier under Clause 5.10 of the LEP.

 

Other land resources

The site is within an established urban context and will not sterilise any significant mineral or agricultural resource.

 

Water cycle

 

The proposed development will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts on water resources and the water cycle.

 

Soils

The proposed development will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts on soils in terms of quality, erosion, stability and/or productivity subject to a standard condition requiring erosion and sediment controls to be in place prior to and during construction.

 

Air and microclimate

The construction and/or operations of the proposed development will be unlikely to result in any adverse impacts on the existing air quality or result in any pollution. Standard precautionary site management condition recommended.

 

Flora and fauna

Construction of the proposed development will not require any removal/clearing of any significant vegetation and therefore will be unlikely to have any significant adverse impacts on biodiversity or threatened species of flora and fauna.

 

Waste

Satisfactory arrangements are in place for proposed storage and collection of waste and recyclables. No adverse impacts anticipated. Standard precautionary site management condition recommended.

 

Energy

No adverse impacts anticipated.

 

Noise and vibration

No adverse impacts anticipated. Condition recommended to restrict construction to standard construction hours.

 

Bushfire

The site is not identified as being bushfire prone.

 

Safety, security and crime prevention

The proposed development will be unlikely to create any concealment/entrapment areas or crime spots that would result in any identifiable loss of safety or reduction of security in the immediate area.

 

Social impacts in the locality

Given the nature of the proposed development and its’ location the proposal is unlikely to result in any adverse social impacts.

 

As noted earlier in this report under SEPP 21 – Caravan Parks, the proposed reconfiguration of sites is not expected to adversely impact on the provision of low cost housing or tourist accommodation opportunities, given the location on the fringe of the Port Macquarie CBD. The land is located within walking distance of a range of services and recreational activities likely to be required by the residents of the caravan park.

 

The Applicant has advised that the reduction in site numbers within the park is a result of a trend towards larger caravans and manufactured homes and the size of the individual sites needs to be increased accordingly. The proposed number of sites reflects how the park is currently operating despite the approval for a larger number of sites.

 

Economic impact in the locality

No adverse impacts. A likely positive impact is that the development will maintain employment in the construction industry, which will lead to flow impacts such as expenditure in the area.

 

Site design and internal design

The proposed development design satisfactorily responds to the site attributes and will fit into the locality. No adverse impacts likely.

 

Construction

No potential adverse impacts identified to neighbouring properties with the construction of the proposal.

 

Cumulative impacts

The proposed development is not expected to have any adverse cumulative impacts on the natural or built environment or the social and economic attributes of the locality.

 

Natural Hazards

See comments earlier in this report regarding flooding and acid sulphate soils.

 

(c)     The suitability of the site for the development:

 

The proposal will fit into the locality and the site attributes are conducive to the proposed development.

 

Site constraints have been adequately addressed and appropriate conditions of consent recommended.

 

(d)     Any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the Regulations:

 

Three (3) written submissions have been received following public exhibition of the application.

 

Key issues raised in the submissions received and comments in response to these issues are provided as follows:

 

Submission Issue/Summary

Planning Comment/Response

Impact of glare from roofs of buildings on sites 1A – 8A and 1B – 3B. Roofs should be a dark, non-reflective colour.

The development application considers the sites within the caravan park only and future buildings would be subject to Section 68 application/s. The sites in the caravan park are capable of accommodating a variety of manufactured homes, of different roof form and external finishes.

What is intended for the area (along the southern boundary) where the cabins are currently located?

This is a matter for the operator of the caravan park.

 

The submitted plans indicate that the area will remain as 9 short-term sites, which is consistent with the current approval to operate. Any future changes to the use of this area would be subject to a separate application.

Loss of views to trees and water.

The development application considers the sites within the caravan park only and future buildings would be subject to Section 68 application/s.

 

The proposed reconfigured studio sites (sites 1A – 8A and 1B – 3B) are located at a substantially lower level than the adjoining residential apartments to the south and would not affect any significant views.

Parking provision for residents and visitors.

The proposal would provide for a parking space on each of the 330 short-term sites and there would be no reduction in the existing visitor parking. Given that the development would result in a reduction of 35 sites within the park, the amount of parking available is considered to be an improvement on the current situation.

Additional noise from traffic.

The proposal would result in 35 less sites that the current approval for the caravan park. The traffic associated with the development is also expected to be reduced on this basis.

 

(e)     The Public Interest:

 

The proposed development satisfies relevant planning controls and is unlikely to impact on the wider public interest.

 

4.       DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS APPLICABLE

 

·    Development contributions will not be required towards augmentation of town water supply and sewerage system head works under Section 64 of the Local Government Act 1993.

·    Development contributions will not be required under Section 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 towards roads, open space, community cultural services, emergency services and administration buildings.

 

 

5.       CONCLUSION

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with Section 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Issues raised during assessment and public exhibition of the application have been considered in the assessment of the application. Where relevant, conditions have been recommended to manage the impacts attributed to these issues.

 

The site is suitable for the proposed development, is not contrary to the public's interest and will not have a significant adverse social, environmental or economic impact. It is recommended that the application be approved, subject to the recommended conditions of consent provided in the attachment section of this report.

 

 

Attachments

 

1View. DA2017 - 1065.1 Plans - DAP Set

2View. DA2017 - 1065.1 Recommended Conditions

3View. DA2017 - 1065.1 Submission - Atkins

4View. DA2017 - 1065.1 Submission - Bradley-Cahalan

5View. DA2017 - 1065.1 Submission - Cooper

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

 

 

Item:          07

 

Subject:     DA2017-1100.1 Dwelling & Swimming Pool, Lot 34 DP 22916, No 12 Surf Street, Port Macquarie

Report Author: Deb McKenzie

 

 

 

Applicant:               S N & H C Morgan

Owner:                    As above

Estimated Cost:     $799,900

Parcel no:               22828

Alignment with Delivery Program

4.3.1  Undertake transparent and efficient development assessment in accordance with relevant legislation.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That DA2017 – 1100.1 for the construction of new dwelling house and swimming pool at Lot 34 DP 22916, No. 12 Surf Street, Port Macquarie be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions.

 

 

Executive Summary

This report considers a development application for the construction of a dwelling house and swimming pool at the subject site and provides an assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Following exhibition of the application, four (4) submissions, including one (1) late submission have been received.

 

1.       BACKGROUND

 

Existing sites features and surrounding development

 

The site has an area of 524.8m². The site is generally rectangular with Surf Street frontage of 17.1m and side boundaries of 32.185m. The site falls from rear to street from RL26.00m AHD to RL22.00m AHD. The subject site has been vacant with generally unmanaged vegetation for a considerable time.

 

Development in the area comprises a mix of low and medium density single dwellings, multi-dwelling housing and medium density residential flat buildings. To the north, east and west are single dwellings, adjoining to the south is a residential flat building. More broadly this area of Flynn’s Beach contains a number of permanent and tourist-based unit developments of various sizes, heights and age.

 

The site is zoned R3 Medium Density Residential in accordance with the Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011, as shown in the following zoning plan:

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=02404ced-8fef-419b-9960-5f833e5af220&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

The existing subdivision pattern and location of existing development within the locality is shown in the following aerial photograph:

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=33416004-2e8d-44d0-91b7-5649422ba33f&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

 

 

2.       DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

 

Key aspects of the proposal include the following:

 

·    Site is zoned R3 – Medium Density Residential

·    Permissible height of building limit is 14.5m and FSR is 1.5:1

·    Site area is less than 600m².

·    Previous residential flat building was approved on the site but not commenced/approval lapsed.

·    Proposal is large single dwelling – up to 9m in height

·    Surrounding development is mix of low and medium density development

 

Refer to attachments at the end of this report.

 

Application Chronology

 

·    12/12/2017 – Development Application (DA) lodged

·    5/1/18 – 18/1/18 – Public Notification of DA

·    1/1/18 – Two submissions received

·    12/1/1/8 – Submission received

·    29/1/18 – Late submission received (due to Xmas/New Year holidays)

·    29/1/18 – Submissions sent to applicant’s architect

·    6/2/18 – Email from architect agreeing to fencing of site

 

3.       STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

 

Section 4.15 Evaluation

 

In determining the application, Council is required to take into consideration the following matters as are relevant to the development that apply to the land to which the development application relates:

 

(a)     The provisions (where applicable) of:

(i)      any Environmental Planning Instrument:

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 - Koala Habitat Protection

 

The site is less than 1ha in area and therefore no further investigations are required.

However it should be noted that a Tree Assessment, prepared by Woodvale Tree Services, identified all the significant vegetation on the site. It concluded:

 

“there are no Primary or Secondary trees identified that as species are listed as having significance to Koala’s within the Port Macquarie Hastings Council Development Control Plans.”

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No.55 – Remediation of Land

 

Following an inspection of the site and a search of Council records, the subject land is not identified as being potentially contaminated and is suitable for the intended use.

 

 

 

State Environmental Planning Policy No. 71 – Coastal Protection and Clause 5.5 of Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011

 

The site is located within a coastal zone as defined in accordance with clause 4 of SEPP 71.

 

In accordance with clause 5, this SEPP prevails over the Port Macquarie-Hastings LEP 2011 in the event of any inconsistency.

 

Having regard to clauses 8 and 12 to 16 of SEPP 71 and clause 5.5 of Hastings LEP 2011 inclusive the proposed development will not result in any of the following:

a) any restricted access (or opportunities for access) to the coastal foreshore

b) any identifiable adverse amenity impacts along the coastal foreshore and on the scenic qualities of the coast;

c) any identifiable adverse impacts on any known flora and fauna (or their natural environment);

d) subject to any identifiable adverse coastal processes or hazards;

e) any identifiable conflict between water and land based users of the area;

f) any identifiable adverse impacts on any items of archaeological/heritage;

g) reduce the quality of the natural water bodies in the locality.

 

The site is predominately cleared and located within an area zoned for residential purposes.

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

A BASIX certificate (No. 859586S) has been submitted demonstrating that the proposal will comply with the requirements of the SEPP. It is recommended that a condition be imposed to ensure that the commitments are incorporated into the development and certified at Occupation Certificate stage.

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011

 

The proposal is consistent with the LEP having regard to the following:

 

·   Clause 2.2, the subject site is zoned R3 Medium Density Residential. In accordance with clause 2.3(1) and the R1 zone landuse table, the dwelling (or ancillary structure to a dwelling) is a permissible landuse with consent.

The objectives of the R3 zone are as follows:

To provide for the housing needs of the community within a medium density residential environment.

To provide a variety of housing types within a medium density residential environment.

To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.

In accordance with Clause 2.3(2), the proposal is consistent with the zone objectives as it is a permissible landuse and consistent with the established residential locality.

·   Clause 4.3, the maximum overall height of the building above ground level (existing) is 8.9m which complies with the standard height limit of 14.5m applying to the site.

·   Clause 4.4, the floor space ratio of the proposal is 0.9:1, which complies with the maximum 1.5:1 floor space ratio applying to the site. Note: the GFA of the dwelling is calculated as 470.6m² (32.5m² of the garage is GFA for the purposes of FSR).

·   Clause 5.9, no listed trees in Development Control Plan 2013 are proposed to be removed.

·   Clause 5.10, the site does not contain or adjoin any known heritage items or sites of significance.

·   Clause 7.13, satisfactory arrangements are in place for provision of essential services.

 

(ii)     Any draft instruments that apply to the site or are on exhibition:

 

No draft instruments relevant or impact on the proposal.

 

(iii)    any Development Control Plan in force:

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Development Control Plan 2013

 

DCP 2013: Dwellings, Dual occupancies, Dwelling houses, Multi dwelling houses & Ancillary development

 

Requirements

Proposed

Complies

3.2.2.1

Ancillary development:

•     4.8m max. height

•     Single storey

•     60m2 max. area

•     100m2 for lots >900m2

•     24 degree max. roof pitch

•     Not located in front setback

Water tank is appropriately located on the southern side of the dwelling.

 

Yes

3.2.2.2

Articulation zone:

•     Min. 3m front setback

•     An entry feature or portico

•     A balcony, deck, patio, pergola, terrace or verandah

•     A window box treatment

•     A bay window or similar feature

•     An awning or other feature over a window

•     A sun shading feature

No elements within the articulation zone.

 

N/A

Front setback (Residential not R5 zone):

•     Min. 6.0m classified road

•     Min. 4.5m local road

•     Min. 3.0m secondary road

•     Min. 2.0m Laneway

Front setback is 6.045m to front wall of dwelling. Complies.

Yes

3.2.2.3

Garage 5.5m min. and 1m behind front façade.

Garage door recessed behind building line or eaves/overhangs provided

Garage door is setback 1.855m behind the front wall of the dwelling.

Garage door recessed.

Yes

 

 

6m max. width of garage door/s and 50% max. width of building

Width of garage door is less than 6m and less than 50% of the width of the dwelling.

Yes

Driveway crossover 1/3 max. of site frontage and max. 5.0m width

Driveway crossing is 5m –1/3 of the width of the site (17.1m).

Yes

3.2.2.4

4m min. rear setback. Variation subject to site analysis and provision of private open space

The rear setback is 5.127m. Complies.

 

Yes

3.2.2.5

Side setbacks:

•     Ground floor = min. 0.9m

•     First floors & above = min. 3m setback or where it can be demonstrated that overshadowing not adverse = 0.9m min.

•     Building wall set in and out every 12m by 0.5m

Northern: 1000mm to ground floor level and rumpus room.

4600m to upper bedroom level.

Southern: 1599mm to garage and kitchen/living area; steps out to 999mm to bedroom 4, bathroom and toilet and 3999mm to upper bedroom level.

Bedroom 4, bathroom and toilet is not compliant with 3m setback control. However, the height of this external wall above natural ground level is less than a standard first level and there are no privacy issues created by the low traffic rooms. Further there is no additional shadow impacts over and above what would be anticipated by a complaint setback in this location.

Acceptable variation to side setback on southern side of building.

3.2.2.6

35m² min. private open space area including a useable 4x4m min. area which has 5% max. grade

The dwelling contains 175.8m² rear yard private  open space, which complies with the minimum dimensions.

Yes

3.2.2.7

Front fences:

•  If solid 1.2m max height and front setback 1.0m  with landscaping

•  3x3m min. splay for corner sites

•  Fences >1.2m to be 1.8m max. height for 50% or 6.0m max. length of street frontage with 25% openings

•  0.9x0.9m splays adjoining driveway entrances

No front fence shown on plans.

Side fences, where relevant are to be 1.8m timber fences, as agreed by the applicant in response to the submissions received.

Condition of consent to apply.

3.2.2.8

Front fences and walls to have complimentary materials to context.

No chain wire, solid timber, masonry or solid steel front fences.

Details to be submitted with Construction Certificate compliant with 3.2.2.7 above.

Condition of consent to apply.

3.2.2.10

Privacy:

•    Direct views between living areas of adjacent dwellings screened when within 9m radius of any part of window of adjacent dwelling and within 12m of private open space areas of adjacent dwellings. ie. 1.8m fence or privacy screening which has 25% max. openings and is permanently fixed

•    Privacy screen required if floor level > 1m height, window side/rear setback (other than bedroom) is less than 3m and sill height less than 1.5m

•    Privacy screens provided to balconies/verandahs etc which have <3m side/rear setback and floor level height >1m

The proposal includes screening, blank walls, low traffic rooms and minimal openings where visual or acoustic privacy impacts may occur. These measures are considered adequate to address privacy.

 

 

Yes

 

DCP 2013: General Provisions

 

Requirements

Proposed

Complies

2.7.2.2

Design addresses generic principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design guideline

No concealment or entrapment areas proposed. Adequate casual surveillance available.

Yes

2.3.3.1

Cut and fill 1.0m max. 1m outside the perimeter of the external building walls

Cut and fill of the site required due to fall of up to 4.0m from rear to front of the site.

 

Any retaining walls 1.0m or higher are to be certified by an engineer. Standard condition of consent to apply.

Yes

2.3.3.2

1m max. height retaining walls along road frontage

None proposed.

N/A

Any retaining wall >1.0 in height to be certified by structure engineer

Condition recommended to require engineering certification

Yes

Combination of retaining wall and front fence height max 1.8m, max length 6.0m or 30% of frontage, fence component 25% transparent, and splay at corners and adjacent to driveway

No retaining wall front fence combination proposed.

N/A

2.3.3.8

Removal of hollow bearing trees

No hollow bearing trees proposed to be removed

N/A

2.6.3.1

Tree removal (3m or higher with 100m diameter trunk at 1m above ground level and 3m from external wall of existing dwelling)

The site is currently in an unmanaged state. Vegetation across the site is proposed to be removed. No significant koala trees exist on the site. There are no specific requirements regarding tree removal.

Yes

2.4.3

Bushfire risk, Acid sulphate soils, Flooding, Contamination, Airspace protection, Noise and Stormwater

Refer to main body of report.

 

2.5.3.2

New accesses not permitted from arterial or distributor roads

No new access proposed to arterial or distribution road.

N/A

Driveway crossing/s minimal in number and width including maximising street parking

Driveway crossing minimal in width including maximising street parking

Yes

2.5.3.3

Parking in accordance with Table 2.5.1.

1 space per single dwelling (behind building line)

Large double garage proposed with additional onsite parking provided in front of the building line. There is no requirement for the parking space and the front setback area should be landscaped in the residential setting of Surf Street.

 

A condition of consent, requiring removal of the parking space in front of the building line is to be applied with this area to be landscaped.

Yes

2.5.3.11

Section 7.11 contributions

Single dwelling only. No contributions applicable

N/A

2.5.3.12 and 2.5.3.13

Landscaping of parking areas

Single dwelling only with 1 domestic driveway. Landscaping of front setback area to be condition of consent.

N/A

2.5.3.14

Sealed driveway surfaces unless justified

Sealed driveway proposed

Yes

2.5.3.15 and 2.5.3.16

Driveway grades first 6m or ‘parking area’ shall be 5% grade with transitions of 2m length

Driveway grades capable of satisfying Council standard driveway crossover requirements. Condition recommended for section 138 Roads Act permit.

Yes

2.5.3.17

Parking areas to be designed to avoid concentrations of water runoff on the surface.

Single dwelling only with 1 domestic driveway. Stormwater drainage is capable of being managed as part of plumbing construction.

Yes

 

(iiia)  any planning agreement that has been entered into under Section 7.4 or any draft planning agreement that a developer has offered to enter into under Section 7.4:

 

No planning agreement has been offered or entered into relating to the site.

 

iv)     any matters prescribed by the Regulations:

 

New South Wales Coastal Policy:

 

The proposed development is consistent with the objectives and strategic actions of this policy.

 

Demolition of buildings AS 2601 – Clause 66 (b)

 

Nil.

 

v)      any coastal zone management plan (within the meaning of the Coastal Protection Act 1979), that apply to the land to which the development application relates:

 

None applicable.

 

(b)     The likely impacts of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, social and economic impacts in the locality:

 

Context and setting

•     The proposal will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts to existing adjoining properties and satisfactorily addresses the public domain.

•     The proposal is considered to be consistent with other residential development in the locality and adequately addresses planning controls for the area.

•     There are no adverse impacts on existing view sharing.

•     There are no adverse privacy impacts.

 

 Access, transport and traffic

The proposal will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts in terms access, transport and traffic. The existing road network will satisfactorily cater for any increase in traffic generation as a result of the development.

 

Water, Sewer, Stormwater Supply

Services available – details required with S.68 application.

 

Other Utilities

Telecommunication and electricity services are available to the site.

 

Heritage

This site does not contain or adjoin any known heritage item or site of significance.

 

Other land resources

No adverse impacts anticipated. The site is within an established urban context and will not sterilise any significant mineral or agricultural resource.

 

Water cycle

The proposed development will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts on water resources and the water cycle.

 

Soils

The proposed development will be unlikely to have any adverse impacts on soils in terms of quality, erosion, stability and/or productivity subject to a standard condition requiring erosion and sediment controls to be in place prior to and during construction.

 

Air and microclimate

The construction and/or operations of the proposed development will be unlikely to result in any adverse impacts on the existing air quality or result in any pollution.

 

 

 

Flora and fauna

Construction of the proposed development will not require any removal/clearing of any significant vegetation and therefore will be unlikely to have any significant adverse impacts on biodiversity or threatened species of flora and fauna. 

 

Waste

Satisfactory arrangements are in place for proposed storage and collection of waste and recyclables. No adverse impacts anticipated.

 

Energy

The proposal includes measures to address energy efficiency and will be required to comply with the requirements of BASIX.

 

Noise and vibration

No adverse impacts anticipated. Condition recommended to restrict construction to standard construction hours.

 

Bushfire

The site is not identified as being bushfire prone. No requirements.

 

Social impacts in the locality

Given the nature of the proposed development and its’ location the proposal is unlikely to result in any adverse social impacts.

 

Economic impact in the locality

No adverse impacts. Likely positive impacts can be attributed to the construction of the development and associated flow on effects (ie maintained employment and expenditure in the area).

 

Site design and internal design

The proposed development design satisfactorily responds to the site attributes and will fit into the locality. No adverse impacts likely.

 

Construction

Neighbours to the north and east have requested timber fence construction along the boundaries to either retain/match a recently constructed new timber fence (northern boundary) and/or access for koalas to food trees at the rear of properties along Pacific Drive. However, it is noted that fencing on the northern side of the dwelling will be required to comply with the Australian Standards for swimming pools and there will be no unobstructed access to the rear of the property post construction. Therefore while the applicant has agreed to provide timber fencing as requested, there is no planning benefit in requiring these as a condition of consent. On this basis the submissions are not supported.

 

Conditions of consent are to be applied regarding the proposed pool fencing to ensure it complies with the Australian Standards, particularly at the intersection of fence and building.

 

Cumulative Impacts

The proposed development is not expected to have any adverse cumulative impacts on the natural or built environment or the social and economic attributes of the locality.

 

(c)     The suitability of the site for the development:

 

The proposal will fit into the locality and the site attributes are conducive to the proposed development.

 

(d)     Any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the Regulations:

 

Four (4) written submissions have been received following public exhibition of the application.

 

Key issues raised in the submissions received and comments in response to these issues are provided as follows:

 

Submission Issue/Summary

Planning Comment/Response

Fencing at rear to be timber, not colorbond to allow koalas to traverse the fence and maintain access to rear of property.

Applicant has agreed to rear fencing being timber. Notwithstanding, any access to the rear of the property and therefore the neighbouring property to the east will no longer be available once the dwelling is built. Therefore the submission requesting ongoing access for koalas is not able to be achieved. The submission is not supported.

Fencing along northern boundary to be timber, not colorbond. Existing timber fence only reconstructed in August 2017 and timber to fit with future house improvements.

Applicant has agreed to timber northern boundary fence, where appropriate (ie not subject to compliance with Australian Standards for the swimming pool and retaining of the boundary).

 

Retention of a corridor from the front of the property to the rear so koalas can access trees within No.s 42 & 44 Pacific Drive.

The property has been a vacant site, unmanaged site for a considerable number of years. There are no koala trees on the subject site and therefore any koala habitat is not located on the subject site. The properties to the east of the site contain large trees and therefore have been accessible for koalas via the vacant block. Any compliant development would prevent future access to the rear of the site for security reasons. It is not reasonable to require the creation of an access easement as part of this application. The submission in this case is not supported.

Overshadowing of communal washing line located within the northern side setback area of No. 14-18 Surf Street.

A review of the shadow diagrams reveals that this area will be predominantly in shadow at the time of the winter solstice. A site inspection confirms that a clothes line is erected in this area and will be impacted during winter. Other seasons of the year will not impact to this extent. The adjoining residential flat building contains an area in the south-east corner where this drying area could be relocated during winter months or permanently. The overshadowing does not impact on any habitable rooms or outdoor private open space areas within the unit complex. The submission in this case is not considered to carry sufficient weight to warrant refusal of the application.

 

(e)     The Public Interest:

 

The proposed development satisfies relevant planning controls and is unlikely to impact on the wider public interest.

 

4.       DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS APPLICABLE

N/A

 

5.       CONCLUSION

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with Section 4.15 (previously Section 79C) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Issues raised during assessment and public exhibition of the application have been considered in the assessment of the application. Where relevant, conditions have been recommended to manage the impacts attributed to these issues.

 

The site is suitable for the proposed development, is not contrary to the public's interest and will not have a significant adverse social, environmental or economic impact. It is recommended that the application be approved, subject to the recommended conditions of consent provided in the attachment section of this report.

 

 

Attachments

 

1View. DA2017 - 1100.1 Plans.

2View. DA2017 - 1100.1 Recommended Conditions

3View. DA2017 - 1100.1 Submission - Gillogly & Whatson

4View. DA2017 - 1100.1 Submission - Knox

5View. DA2017 - 1100.1 Submission - Turner

6View. DA2017 - 1100.1 Submission - Yee-Pickering

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

 

 

Item:          08

 

Subject:     Section 96 Modification DA2016 - 404.2 Modification to Industry (Cement Depot) - Lot 21 DP 1205839, 39 Randall Street, Wauchope

Report Author: Benjamin Roberts

 

 

 

Applicant:               Emm Consulting Pty Ltd

Owner:                    Transport for NSW

Estimated Cost:     N/A

Parcel no:               64253

Alignment with Delivery Program

4.3.1  Undertake transparent and efficient development assessment in accordance with relevant legislation.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the section 96 modification to DA2016 - 404 for a modification to industry (cement depot) – increase in throughput at Lot 21, DP 1205839, No. 39 Randall Street, Wauchope, be determined by granting consent subject to the recommended conditions.

 

Executive Summary

 

This report considers a Section 96(2) modification application at the subject site and provides an assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

Development consent was granted by Council on 23 November 2016 for an increase in throughput of the existing industry (cement depot) from 15,000 tonnes per annum to 60,000 tonnes per annum. The development is integrated development and General Terms of Approval (GTAs) were issued by the New South Wales Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). One of the GTAs is that noise generated at the premises must not exceed a noise limit of 50 dB(A) LAeq(15 minute) at all residential noise receivers.

This modification application seeks to increase the noise limit contained within the GTA from 50 dB(A) LAeq(15 minute) to 58 dB(A) LAeq(15 minute).

 

Following exhibition of the application, one (1) submission has been received.

 

 

1.       BACKGROUND

 

Existing sites features and surrounding development

 

The site is located at 4 Wallace Street, Wauchope. The site is approximately 1000m² in area and forms part of the larger land holding known as Lot 21 DP1205839. The land holding is traversed by the North Coast Railway line and contains the railway station buildings.

 

The land holding is zoned IN1 General Industrial and B4 Mixed Use, and the site of the development is zoned IN1 General Industrial in accordance with the Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011, as shown in the following zoning plan:

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=90089891-bf66-40db-abd7-b835fa8dda9f&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

The existing subdivision pattern and location of existing development within the locality is shown in the following aerial photograph:

 

http://pmhq-v-gtx01.pmhc.nsw.gov.au/Geocortex/Essentials/GXE471/REST/TempFiles/EBP%20Layout.jpg?guid=3af206fe-374d-4a48-95e2-03d5a6839a2b&contentType=image%2Fjpeg

2.       DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

 

Key aspects of the proposal include the following:

 

·    Seek an increase to the noise limit contained within a General Term of Approval issued by NSW EPA from 50 dB(A) LAeq(15 minute) to 58 dB(A) LAeq(15 minute).

 

Refer to attachments at the end of this report.

 

Application Chronology

 

·    18 October 2017 – Application lodged.

·    20 October 2017 – Application referred to NSW Environmental Protection Authority (EPA).

·    2 November to 1 December 2017 – Public exhibition via neighbour notification.

·    8 November 2017 – Request for additional information received from EPA.

·    10 December 2017 – Additional information request sent to applicant.

·    6 December 2017 – Copy of submission sent to EPA.

·    6 December 2017 – Additional information response received from applicant.

·    7 December 2017 – Additional information referred to EPA.

·    20 December 2017 – Response from EPA received.

·    3 January 2018 – EPA response provided to applicant.

 

3.       STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

 

Is the proposal substantially the same?

Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 enables the modification of consents and categorises modifications into three categories - S.96(1) for modifications involving minor error, mis-description or miscalculation; S.96(1A) for modifications involving minimal environmental impact; and S.96(2) for other modifications or modifications that require a condition imposed by a Minister, public authority or approval body to be amended. Each type of modification must be considered as being substantially the same to that which was originally consented to.

 

The subject application is being considered under the provisions of Section 96(2) as a condition by the EPA requires amending. The proposal is considered to be substantially the same development to that which was originally lodged and consented to and will have minimal environmental impact. In particular, the only change relates to a consent condition surrounding maximum permitted noise levels. No further change to the cement quarry operations or throughput is proposed. Having regard to the above, the proposed modification is not considered to alter the fundamental essence of the original development.

 

Are there any condition(s) of consent imposed by a Minister, government or public authority that require modification?

 

Yes. A change to a condition imposed by the NSW Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) is sought. The application was referred to the NSW EPA for consideration. The EPA’s response is attached. The matters raised in the EPA response are discussed below.

 

1.       The proponent’s response confirmed that the cumulative noise level from operations during a 15minute period is 58dBA. It also advised that the calculated daytime amenity noise level is LAeq, day 55dB. The proponent is therefore proposing an increase to the consent intrusive (15 minute) level of 58dBA. This is more than 10dB above the previously derived Project Specific Noise Level of 47dBA. The EPA does not usually licence such levels.

  1.  

2.            Planning comment: Noted.

  1.  

2.       The site appears to be a legacy of past planning decisions that don’t align with today’s expectations regarding noise. The EPA however acknowledges that the mitigation works undertaken by the proponent are likely to have reduced noise by up to 6dB. Considering the information provided, the EPA could support the application provided noise from the activity does not exceed the amenity level of LAeq, day 55dB, and that this level is not increased by noise from other industries in the area.

  1.  

5.            Planning comment: Noted. Council can only assess the application at hand. Any future expansion by an existing industry or Boral would be subject to further noise impact assessment.

  1.  

7.            Council’s Environmental Health Officer has reviewed the professional reports and advised that the new Noise Policy for Industry prepared by NSW EPA dated October 2017 provides an amenity criterion of 65 decibels for a residence in an “industrial interface” area and 60 decibels for an urban residence so the proposed noise level of 58dB(A) does not appear unreasonable.

  1.  

9.            Notwithstanding this any modified consent would be issued consistent with the EPA advice with a maximum amenity level of LAeq, day 55dB.

  1.  

3.       Council and the proponent must consider that this sterilises or severely constrains the local area for other industry (Boral will take up the entire noise “headroom” for industry in the local area) and for any future expansion of the site by Boral. Council will need to consider the socio-economic benefits of the development and weigh them against the community response to the proposed expansion in deciding whether to approve the application.

  1.  

12.          Planning comment: Noted. Council can only assess the application at hand. Any future expansion by an existing industry or Boral would be subject to further noise impact assessment.

 

4.       It is noted that the proponent has previously ruled out the construction of a noise wall. The EPA recommends that this option is reconsidered. A noise wall would likely reduce the noise levels further whilst also providing a visual barrier to the operation.

  1.  

14.          Planning comment: The application is supported by a further review of noise emissions undertaken by EMM Consulting, dated 29 August 2017. The report provides an assessment of feasible and reasonable noise mitigation measures as per the NSW EPA’s Industrial Noise Policy. The review concludes that the main source of noise emissions from the site is engine noise from trucks manoeuvring on site and that a noise barrier is not considered practical and would have limited effectiveness given the site constraints i.e. limited distance between the location for loading and the site entry/exit. The report outlines additional noise mitigation measures that have been undertaken to minimise truck engine noise while trucks are being loaded on site.

  1.  

16.          Council’s Environmental Health Officer has reviewed the professional reports and agrees that a noise barrier is unlikely to be of any great benefit in this instance.

 

5.       The EPA also recommends that Council include a condition in any approval, if granted, for Boral to schedule arrivals and deliveries so that trucks are not queuing in Wallace Street prior to being allowed on the Boral site and are not arriving prior to commencement of operations at 7am.

  1.  

18.          Planning comment. Noted. Condition recommended.

 

Does the application require notification/advertising in accordance with the regulations and/or any Development Control Plan?

 

Neighbour notification has been undertaken in accordance with the Port Macquarie-Hastings Development Control Plan 2013.

 

Any submissions made concerning the modification?

During exhibition one (1) petition style submission was received containing nine (9) signatures.

 

Key issues raised in the submission received and comments in response to the issues are provided as follows:

 

Submission Issue/Summary

Planning Comment/Response

The increase in noise and production would be detrimental to our wellbeing.

There is no change to approved production levels under this application. There is no evidence provided to suggest the increase in allowable maximum noise levels will be detrimental to the wellbeing of nearby residents. The EPA have permitted a maximum allowable noise level of 55dBA (day time).

The increase in noise and production would be detrimental to our property values.

There is no change to approved production levels under this application. There is no evidence provided to suggest the increase in allowable maximum noise levels to 55dBA (day time) will affect property values.

The increase in noise and production would disrupt our lives more than it already does.

There is no change to approved production levels under this application. No evidence has been provided to suggest the increase in allowable maximum noise level to 55dBA (day time) will adversely disrupt the lives of nearby residents.

We already put up with trucks that block the road at times and the noise is just tolerable at the moment.

Condition has been added to ensure truck arrivals and deliveries are scheduled to ensure no queening in Wallace Street. Refer to comments under noise impacts heading of this report.

The operation needs to move to a more suitable place not a suburban street.

This is an existing industry operating within an industrial zone.

 

Any matters referred to in section 79C (1) relevant to the modification?

 

Overall, the proposed development remains consistent with the original s79C assessment. Refer to comments provided in the original DAP assessment attached to this report. Comments on notable changes are included below.

 

Noise

 

Operational noise

 

A noise impact assessment was submitted as part of the original application. The assessment reviewed both operational and road traffic noise. The assessment was undertaken by EMM consulting, dated 24 February 2016 and reviewed by Council’s Environmental Health Officer. In summary, the original proposed increase in throughput was deemed to not change existing hours of operation or require any modifications or additions to existing site infrastructure at the depot. Hence, there would be no change to the level of operational noise emissions from the site above the measured worst case at the site.

 

The original General Terms of Approval issued by the NSW EPA also provided specific noise level emission conditions that will need to be adhered to. This current modification is requesting a change to a condition 9 of the issued General Term of Approval. In support of this application, a further review of noise emissions was undertaken by EMM Consulting, dated 29 August 2017. This report was reviewed by Council’s Environmental Health Officer whom advised the proposal is reasonable and because truck engine noise is the main noise generator onsite, a noise barrier is unlikely to be of any great benefit.

 

Council’s Environmental Health Officer also advised that the new Noise Policy for Industry prepared by NSW Environmental Protection Authority dated October 2017 has an amenity criterion of 65 decibels for a residence in an “Industrial Interface” area and 60 decibels for an urban residence so the expected operational noise level of 58 dB(A) from the Boral depot is not considered unreasonable.

 

The response from the NSW Environmental Protection Authority is attached and in summary provides for an increase in the maximum permitted amenity level of LAeq, day 55dB only and not day 58dB as requested. Consistent with the EPA advice any modified consent shall contain reference to a maximum LAeq, day 55dB noise limit.

 

Proposed changes to conditions

Refer to attached draft recommended consent with conditions subject to change being highlighted in red. A copy of the current consent conditions is also attached for reference.

 

 

4.       DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS

 

As per original application it has been considered that the increase in throughput will not result in any adverse impact to the local road network. Accordingly development contributions are not applicable under Section 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 towards roads, open space, community cultural services, emergency services and administration buildings.

 

5.       CONCLUSION

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with Section 96 and 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Issues raised during assessment and public exhibition of the application have been considered in the assessment of the application. Where relevant, conditions have been recommended to manage the impacts attributed to these issues.

 

The site is suitable for the proposed development, is not contrary to the public's interest and will not have a significant adverse social, environmental or economic impact. It is recommended that the application be approved, subject to the recommended conditions of consent provided in the attachment section of this report.

 

 

Attachments

 

1View. DA2016 - 404.1 EPA issued GTAs

2View. DA2016 - 404.1 Development Consent and Conditions

3View. DA2016 - 404.2 Statement of Environmental Effects

4View. DA2016 - 404.2 EPA Response letter

5View. DA2016 - 404.2 Applicants response to additional information response from EPA

6View. DA2016 - 404.2 Recommended  Conditions

7View. DA2016 - 404.2 Response to Council regarding Community Submission on Modification - Boral

8View. DA2016 - 404.2  Submission - Masters

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

 

 

Item:          09

 

Subject:     Section 96 Modification DA2013 - 211.2 - Modification To A Continued Use Of Animal Boarding And Training Establishment (Horse Riding) - Lot 4 DP 1110091, No 334 Crows Road, Frazers Creek

Report Author: Patrick Galbraith-Robertson

 

 

 

Applicant:               J A Woods

Owner:                    M F Ennor & J A Woods

Estimated Cost:     N/A

Parcel no:               47461

Alignment with Delivery Program

4.3.1  Undertake transparent and efficient development assessment in accordance with relevant legislation.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That the Section 96 modification to DA2013 - 211 for a proposed amendment to conditions of consent relating to a previous approved continued use of an animal boarding and training establishment (horse riding) at Lot 4, DP 1110091, No. 334 Crows Road, Frazers Creek, be determined by granting approval subject to the recommended conditions.

 

Executive Summary

 

This report considers a Section 96(1A) modification of consent application at the subject site and provides an assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Being a Section 96 modification, the modified proposal has only been assessed against the legislation and related planning guidelines in place at the time of the original assessment.

 

Following exhibition of the application, three (3) submissions were received.

 

Key assessment issues relate to the submission issues raised.

 

1.       BACKGROUND

 

Existing sites features and Surrounding development

 

The site has an area of 154.6 hectares.

 

The site is zoned RU2 Rural Landscape in accordance with the Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2011, as shown in the following zoning plan:

 

 

The existing subdivision pattern and location of existing development within the locality is shown in the following aerial photograph:

 

 

2.       DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

 

The original proposal was approved on 1 October 2014 by Council’s Development Assessment Panel as follows and subject to conditions which included a time limited consent of three (3) years:

 

·    The boarding of up to 30 draft-cross, stockhorse and walers on the property for breeding and training purposes.

·    Conducting horse riding tours within the local area with guides.

·    Overnight trail rides to local tourist spots such as the Beechwood Hotel are offered. Horse riding outside the property only occurs on or through land with the appropriate landowner’s permission.

·    All riders are brought on to the site from Bellangry Road by the property managers via a troop carrier traversing Crows Road. There are no intended direct vehicular visits to the property.

·    Use of a section of Crows Road crown road within close proximity to Bellangry Road - established parking area - for parking of customer vehicles and pickup by operators

·    Occasional guest accommodation offered with overnight tourist accommodation within existing worker’s cottage accommodation building.

·    No formal camping area is proposed

·    A maximum of 12 riders at any one time with up to two sessions per day (as amended during the assessment of the DA).

·    Installation of an upgraded on-site sewage management system

·    A new external toilet was originally proposed however has been deleted from the proposal during the assessment of the DA.

·    The proposal is currently in operation and has been operating since 2003.

 

On 1 October 2014 the Development Assessment Panel resolved the following:

 

‘This consent is valid for a period of 3 years from the date of determination. An application to modify this consent or a new development application will need to be lodged and determined before the expiration of the 3 year period to continue the development. It is recommended this be done at least 6months prior to expiration.

 

Key aspects of the modified proposal include the following:

 

·    Remove/delete the conditional restriction requirement for development from 3 years to being unrestricted in timeframe.

·    Seek a timeframe extension to allow time for Department of Industry - Lands process of road closure to be complete with a license and buy back of the section of Crown Road traversing the property.

·    There are no plan changes to the layout or nature of operations of the current approved operating development.

 

Refer to attachments at the end of this report of current consent, approved plans and relevant attachments. There are no changes to plans.

 

Application Chronology

 

·    6 October 2017 – Modification application lodged.

·    7 November 2017 – Additional information request – clarification of proposed changes to conditions.

·    7 November 2017 – Applicant provided additional information to clarify proposed changes.

·    10 to 23 November 2017 – Neighbour notification of proposed modification proposal.

·    23 November 2017 – Submission issues forwarded to Applicant.

·    30 January 2018 – Additional information received from Applicant in response to submission issues.

·    7 March 2018 – Additional information received from Applicant – confirmation of right of carriageway registration and response to submission issues.

 

3.       STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

 

Is the proposal substantially the same?

Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 enables the modification of consents and categorises modifications into three categories - S.96(1) for modifications involving minor error, mis-description or miscalculation; S.96(1A) for modifications involving minimal environmental impact; and S.96(2) for other modifications. Each type of modification must be considered as being substantially the same to that which was originally consented to.

 

The subject application is being considered under the provisions of Section 96(1A).

 

The proposal is considered to be substantially the same development to that which was originally lodged and consented to and will have minimal environmental impact when comparing the modification proposal to the original proposal. The proposed modification is not considered to alter the fundamental essence of the original development.

 

Are there any condition(s) of consent imposed by a Minister, government or public authority that require modification?

 

No changes to any conditions imposed by a Minister, government or public authority.

Does the application require notification/advertising in accordance with the regulations and/or any Development Control Plan?

 

Neighbour notification has been undertaken in accordance with the Port Macquarie Hastings Development Control Plan 2013.

 

Any submissions made concerning the modification?

Three (3) written submissions were received following public exhibition via neighbour notification of the application.

 

Key issues raised in the submissions received and comments in response to the issues are provided as follows:

 

Submission Issue/Summary

Planning Comment/Response

427 Crows Road

Concern with number of trips troop carrier making along Crows Road to pick up customers for riding session.

The Applicant has a responsibility to comply with the condition for a maximum 12 riders at any one time, which will limit the number of troop carrier movements.

Concern with customers driving into the site as well as along Crows Road past the carpark pick up point which is contrary to the terms of the DA.

This is a compliance matter which the Applicant has been reminded of.

Bellrowan should contributed to road standard maintenance given the large increase in traffic for a business.

No upgrades are recommended in the original approval. This is a matter to be resolved between parties sharing the Crown road.

It is noted that from a site visit that the road has been upgraded in sections with contribution from the Applicant.

Riders are not staying within the site and are not permitted to use a Crown Road.

Riders are permitted to ride within the site and are permitted to use any repass on any established Crown Road.

Question whether the carpark at the end of the Crows Road has been surveyed and approved by Crown Lands.

The parking of vehicles within the road reserve of Crows Road near Bellangry Road is permitted. Refer to attached written advice to this report. No survey information is available.

217 Crows Road

The existing carpark has never had approval and 6 months have passed by with no approval granted.

The parking of vehicles within the road reserve of Crows Road near Bellangry Road is permitted. Refer to attached written advice to this report.

The Applicant has also advised that the carpark is available for other residents of Crows Road as a load/unload point and for family and friends.

Question the amount of time waiting as being short. People can have to wait up until an hour to be picked up with no facilities such as toilets.

 

The subject area for pick up is still considered to be a short term parking area for customers. Customers should time their visit to coincide with the planned pickup time. This an ongoing management issue that Bellrowan Horse Riding will need to manage and is a not a reason for recommending refusal to the application. No formal facilities are recommended to be put in place and unable to be positioned within a Crown Road reserve.

The Applicant has further advised that the clients are advised to be at the pickup point a maximum of 10 minutes prior to departure. They are also informed that if they are early, just 6 minutes back along Bellangry Road is the Beechwood Café where they are told they can purchase coffee and ice creams etc.

Concern with the standard of the carpark on Crows Road and question whether some of parking area is on private land.  Question whether assessing officer inspected the carpark and site.

The parking of vehicles within the road reserve of Crows Road near Bellangry Road is permitted. Refer to attached written advice to this report.

The Crown Road reserve is 20m wide and no vehicles are blocked from travelling on the main road access.

The assessing officer has inspected the carpark and the site including prior to completing this assessment report.

Concern with safety of entry from Bellangry Road. The intersection is dangerous.

The existing access arrangements with a legal Crown Road connecting to Bellangry Road as approved has not changed. It is noted that cars entering Crows Road are doing a left turn only when they arrive and the carpark pick up point is located some 200m along Crows Road with no queuing required.

Question whether emergency services can access the site.

It is noted that ambulances may not be able to physically access the site in the event of accident on the property. In the event of a life threatening or serious injury the Westpac rescue helicopter can be engaged or if nonlife threatening or a minor injury sustained a client/customer can be transported by the operator’s troop carrier back to the carparking area near Bellangry Road and then transported to nearest hospital.

Concern with timeframe to realign the Crown Road access with structures on it some 2 ½ years on.

With regard to existing structures within the Crown road reserve referred to (in proximity to the existing dwelling on the property), the Applicant is seeking an extension of 5 years of time 13 October 2014 (13 October 2019) required for the Crown Lands process to complete the license. Four (4) years is only recommended to be supported (13 October 2018). The Applicant has advised that a right of carriageway has been put in place to provide legal alternative access to neighbours around the Crown reserve. The lease application has also been lodged with Crown Lands.

Having regard to the Applicant’s genuine approach to resolving and progressing compliance with the condition and having regard to being advised that the process is lengthy, the timeframe is recommended to be extended but only until 13 October 2018.

Concern that the 3 to 4 metre width Crows Road is stated by Council to be completely unacceptable for a Council road however Council approves it for business to operate.

The existing access arrangements with a legal Crown Road connecting to Bellangry Road as approved has not changed.

The site is accessed via Crows Road which is a crown road in average condition. All visitors are required to park in the parking area nearby to Bellangry Road in the crown road reserve. Visitors are required to be brought onto the site via the operator’s vehicle (troop carrier) so as to reduce the number of vehicle movements along Crows Road. This is a management issue the operator is required to comply with and the maintenance is a private matter between the residents.

Bellrowan should contributed to road standard maintenance given the large increase in traffic for a business.

No upgrades are recommended in the original approval. This is a matter to be resolved between parties sharing the Crown road.

It is noted that there is use of the Crows Road by 5 properties in the first 1.5 kilometres and after that point there is another 5 properties. The traffic referred to may not specifically be entirely related to the operations of Bellrowan as referred to.

Concern with timeframe to process the original DA and comply with conditions of consent.

The lengthy timeframe is noted however given the nature and somewhat complexity of the issues raised during the original application, including requiring input from NSW Rural Fire Service, it is considered the timeframe is justified.

The Applicant has made reasonable efforts to comply with all requests for additional information and attended to complying with conditions of consent noting the cost involved with such upgrades.

43 Ocean Valley Road

Dispute that the conditions have been complied with.

All conditions have been complied with, with the exception of the Crown Road license not being finalised (which is lodged and in process and takes a considerable amount of time).

All visitors are required to park in the parking area nearby to Bellangry Road in the crown road reserve. Visitors are required to be brought onto the site via the operator’s vehicle (troop carrier) to reduce the number of vehicle movements along Crows Road. This is a management issue the operator is required to comply with.

There have been numerous instances of trespass onto neighbours land by users of the subject business.

Use of existing formed crown roads for passing or travel outside the subject property is permissible and any other matters of trespass claimed are not an issue for the subject DA. 

 

The Applicant has advised that there was an issue of identifying whether the crown road was following the defined route over this neighbours property approximately 8 years ago. However the owners have ensured there is no issue now.

There have been instances where horses have escaped the Applicant’s property causing the potential for injury or damage to persons or property on neighbour’s land.

The Applicant has advised that there may have been an issue historically of horses not being confined to boundaries which was not deliberate and they were retrieved as soon as possible when made aware of the issue.

The Applicant has stated that no horses have escaped in the last 8 years.

Concern raised of insurance implications of a bushfire trail through this neighbouring property was allowed. Concern raised that this use is unauthorised and the subject neighbouring property does not provide owner’s consent to such use of a fire trail.

There is no change to existing approved arrangements that in the event of a bushfire emergency the existing Crown Road through this neighbouring property can be used as an alternate escape route. This was approved by the NSW Rural Fire Service.

The Applicant has advised that they would like to retain this option of emergency exit in the event of fire emergency.

The neighbour’s permission is not considered to be required to use existing Crown Roads as constructed.

The fire trails referred to are roads on this neighbouring land which do not align with the purported Crown Roads and will be on private property.

 

Any matters referred to in section 79C (1) relevant to the modification?

 

Overall, the proposed development remains consistent with the original s79C assessment. Areas of the original assessment impacted by the changes or with revised comments are outlined below:

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Development Control Plan 2011

 

In accordance with Development Provision 3.1 and 3.2, the DCP does not specify any recommended off-street parking rate for the facility. In this regard, the parking arrangements within the Crows Road road reserve are satisfactory for the maximum 12 riders to park their cars and then be picked up by the operators. The area is considered to have ample capacity to allow for parking of several cars in a safe location on the Crows Road reserve itself. Other staff and trainers can park at the facility or obtain a lift in the same arrangements.

 

Context & Setting

The proposal is remote from any public domain with no adverse impacts identified.

 

The proposal adequately addresses applicable planning controls.

 

Access, Transport & Traffic

The site is accessed via Crows Road which is a crown road in average condition. All visitors are required to park in the parking area nearby to Bellangry Road in the crown road reserve. Visitors are brought onto the site via the operator’s vehicle (troop carrier) to reduce the number of vehicle movements along Crows Road.

 

The current condition A(7) requires the following:

 

(7) A licence from NSW Trade and Investment for the continued use of the structures and the carparking area located within the Crown road reserve is to be obtained within 6 months of consent.

With regard to the existing parking area on Crow’s Road referred to above, the Applicant has provided written advice from the Department of Industry – Lands that a license is not necessary as per the second part of the above condition. This component of the ‘carparking area’ is therefore recommended to be deleted from the condition.

 

With regard to existing structures within the Crown road reserve referred to (in proximity to the existing dwelling on the property), the Applicant is seeking an extension of 5 years of time 13 October 2014 (13 October 2019) required for the Crown Lands process to complete the license. Four (4) years is only recommended to be supported (13 October 2018). The Applicant has also noted that a right of carriageway (refer attached document of transfer granting easement and application for lease form completed as lodged) is put in place to provide legal alternative access to neighbours around the Crown reserve. Having regard to the Applicant’s genuine approach to resolving and progressing compliance with the condition and having regard to being advised that the process is lengthy, the extension in timeframe is recommended to be supported however only until 13 October 2018.

 

The above condition A(7) is recommended to be modified as per the attached modified conditions list.

 

Overall, the proposal will be unlikely to have any identifiable adverse impacts within the immediate locality in terms access, transport and traffic. The existing public road network connecting to the Crown Road access will satisfactorily cater for any increase in traffic generation as a result of the development.

 

On-site sewer

An on-site wastewater management report prepared by Rosewood Environmental Services was previously submitted and approved. The Rosewood report provided a satisfactory assessment of the suitability of the site for wastewater treatment and provides options for waste water disposal with either a wastewater treatment unit and land application system or a single waste water treatment unit (4000 litre septic tank) both with evapo-transpiration trenches.

 

An upgrade of the on-site sewage management system was conducted in 2015, with a Council inspection undertaken. The installation was done in accordance with the Rosewood Environmental Report for a new septic tank and 4 x 20m trenches.

 

The OSM system upgrade was sized for the existing residence, guest quarters and an external toilet for horse riders and staff.

 

The conditional matters required under this consent have therefore been satisfied.

 

Water and soils

The proposal includes continued ongoing horse riding on existing trails within the property with no additional trails proposed.

 

Air & Micro-climate

The operations of the proposed development will be unlikely to result in any adverse impacts on the existing air quality or result in any pollution or odour impacts to neighbour.

 

Flora & Fauna

The proposal includes approval for selective removal of immature trees within the southern extent of the bushfire asset protection zone to achieve the maximum tree canopy coverage permitted under Bushfire risk regulations. The removal of these trees will be unlikely to result in any significant adverse ecological impacts and larger habitat trees will be retained.

 

Noise & Vibration

The proposed continued scale of the facility operations is considered to not be significant with up to a maximum of 12 riders in any one session with associated overnight accommodation. The nature of horse riding within an established rural setting is considered unlikely to generate any identifiable adverse noise impacts that could be offensive to neighbouring properties.

 

With regard to the overnight accommodation and associated objections received, the Applicant has anecdotally advised that their facility is not intended to generate any offensive noise within the locality of an evening and night-time. In this regard, the nearest sensitive receivers being dwellings (lawfulness of these dwellings has not been checked) are approximately 600m+ from the proposed facility. This is considered to be a significant distance from the facility to reduce any noise generated from people speaking outside. The Applicants previously have been advised of the concerns raised in the submissions received.

 

The current precautionary offensive noise condition under the Protection of Environment Operations Act 1997 is to be retained in place to address any complaints in the event of significant noise.

 

Natural Hazards - Bushfire risk

The site is identified as being bushfire prone.

 

The current condition A(2) and A(6) requires the following:

 

(3) (A013) The general terms of approval from the following authorities, as referred to in section 93 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and referenced below, are attached and form part of the consent conditions for this approval.

 

NSW Rural Fire Service - The General Terms of Approval, Reference D13/1136 DA13060487661 and dated (23 July 2014), are attached and form part of this consent.

 

(6) All upgrade works required by conditions of this consent (including bushfire mitigation measures) and the Emergency and Evacuation Management Plan are to be completed within six (6) months of the date of commencement of this consent.

 

The applicant has previously submitted several bushfire reports prepared by a Certified Consultant which have taken a considerable amount of time to resolve. The key recommendations of the bushfire safety authority granted include the following requirements which are recommended to form part of the consent approval conditions:

 

1. The facility is to be closed in the event of a catastrophic bushfire danger rating declared.

2. The main dwelling is to be upgraded to be a bushfire refuge building.

3. An asset protection zone (APZ) of 100m is to be provided comprising 70m inner protection APZ and 30m outer APZ.

4. A Vegetation Management Plan shall be prepared and submitted to Council to specify how the vegetation will be managed within the APZ areas.

5. A 10,000 litre fire fighting water supply must be available.

6. Emergency evacuation is to comply with the requirements of NSW Rural Fire Service’s Planning for Bushfire Protection 2006. An emergency evacuation plan is required to be prepared.

7. Compliance with the approved Bushfire Operational Plan submitted.

 

The Applicant has submitted satisfactory information to address these conditional requirements.

 

Safety, Security & Crime Prevention

The proposed development will be unlikely to create any concealment/entrapment areas or crime spots that would result in any identifiable loss of safety or reduction of security in the immediate area. The facility has been in operation since 2003 with no apparent issues of security.

 

Social Impact in the Locality

Given the nature of the proposed development and its’ location the proposal is unlikely to result in any adverse social impacts.

 

Cumulative Impacts

The proposed development is not expected to have any adverse cumulative impacts on the natural or built environment or the social and economic attributes of the locality.

 

(c) The suitability of the site for the development:

 

The current conditions A(8), E(1) and F(1) to F(6) requires the following:

 

A(8) This consent is valid for a period of 3 years from the date of determination. An application to modify this consent or a new development application will need to be lodged and determined before the expiration of the 3 year period to continue the development. It is recommended this be done at least 6 months prior to expiration.

 

E(1) (E001) The workers cottage premises shall not be occupied by overnight clients until an Occupation Certificate has been issued by the Principal Certifying Authority.

 

F(1) (F005) This consent does not permit camping associated with the horse riding facility operations outside of a 30m radius footprint of the existing workers dwelling. Overnight accommodation in the existing workers dwelling is for clients and workers associated with the horse riding facility.

 

F(2) (F009) All new and existing essential fire safety measures shall be maintained in working condition at all times within the workers cottage.

 

F(3) (F195) All clients shall park in the Crows Road road reserve in close proximity to Bellangry Road and not enter the site by their own vehicle.

 

F(4) (F196) Clearing of trees within the Outer Protection Area Asset Protection Zone (OPA APZ) required by the NSW Rural Fire Service is to be kept of a minimum to satisfy the tree canopy coverage requirements. No hollow bearing or old growth trees are permitted to be removed within these OPA APZ areas.

 

F(5) (F197) Offensive noise as defined under the Protection of Environment Operations Act 1997, shall not be generated as a result of the operation of the development.

 

F(6) A maximum of 12 riders in any one session are permitted on the site any one time.

 

The proposal will fit into the locality and the site attributes are conducive to the proposed development. The Applicant has submitted all necessary information and have advised that they have made a genuine effort to comply with all conditional requirements of the current consent. There is no reason identified to recommend refusing consent to the modification application.

 

Overall, it is considered that the site is suitable and that the proposal be granted a continued operational consent and the current condition timeframe restriction be removed.

 

4.       DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS APPLICABLE

 

No development contributions are required particularly having regard to the existing use rights of the existing workers cottage which has been in existence since the 1960s.

 

5.       CONCLUSION

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with Section 96 and 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Issues raised during assessment and public exhibition of the application have been considered in the assessment of the application.

 

The site is suitable for the proposed modified development, is not contrary to the public's interest and will not have a significant adverse social, environmental or economic impact. It is recommended that the modification application be approved, subject to the recommended conditions of consent provided in the attachment section of this report.

 

 

Attachments

 

1View. DA2013 - 211.2 Plans & Documents

2View. DA2013 - 211.2 Recommended Conditiona

3View. DA2013 - 211.2 Email re Continued Use of Land

4View. DA2013 - 211.2 Transfer Granting Easement

5View. DA2013 - 211.2 DA Consent Approval, Plans, On-site & Bushfire Report

6View. DA2013 - 211.2 Submission - Byrnes for Rumbel

7View. DA2013 - 211.2 Submission - Coyle

8View. DA2013 - 211.2 Submission - Van De Linde

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


AGENDA                                              Development Assessment Panel      14/03/2018

 

 

Item:          10

 

Subject:     Section 96 Modification DA2010 - 572.11 - Modification Of Subdivision Layout And Dwelling Design (Proposed Lots 213 To 217) - Lot 498 DP 1237901 Crestwood Drive, Port Macquarie.

Report Author: Patrick Galbraith-Robertson

 

 

 

Applicant:               Land Dynamics Australia

Owner:                    Richmond Horizons Pty Ltd & A R & P A Richmond

Estimated Cost:     Nil

Parcel no:               66277

Alignment with Delivery Program

4.3.1  Undertake transparent and efficient development assessment in accordance with relevant legislation.

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That DA2010 – 572.11 for a Section 96 modification to subdivision layout and design of dwellings (proposed Lots 213 to 217) at Lot 498, DP 1237901, Crestwood Drive, Port Macquarie be determined by granting the modified consent subject to recommended conditions as modified.

 

Executive Summary

 

This report considers a Section 96(1A) modification of consent application at the subject site and provides an assessment of the application in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Being a Section 96 modification, the modified proposal has only been assessed against the legislation and related planning guidelines in place at the time of the original assessment.

 

Following exhibition of the application, three (3) submissions were received.

 

The modification proposal has been amended following the neighbour notification period. The primary changes are detailed later in this report.

 

1.       BACKGROUND

 

Existing sites features and Surrounding development

 

The current site is a residual lot from a developing subdivision and multi-dwelling housing development under the subject DA.

 

The site has an area of 4793.6m².

 

The site is zoned 2(a1) residential in accordance with the Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2001, which was in force at the time of the original application, as shown in the following zoning plan:

 

 

The existing subdivision pattern and location of existing development within the locality is shown in the following aerial photograph (Nearmap: December 2017):

 

 

2.       DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT

 

Key aspects of the modified proposal (as amended following neighbour notification) include the following:

 

·    Amendments to design of approved dwellings on proposed Lots 213 to 217;

·    Relocation of the northern boundary of proposed Lots 213 – 219 to be moved 1m south;

·    Propose to allow access to the end corner lot being proposed Lot 220 from either Pennant Lane or Horizons Parkway.

 

Refer to attachments at the end of this report.

 

Below is a summary of the changes/amendments made to the modification in Rev A submitted on 24 January 2018:

 

1.   Removal of proposed dwellings on Lots 219 and 220, remaining as two (2) lots being as approved;

2.   Retention of the original approved dwelling on Lot 218, with changes only proposed to Dwellings on Lots 213 to 217;

3.   Relocation of the northern boundary of Lots 213 – 219 to be moved 1m south. This allows for the existing electricity easement to be wholly within the Community Lot 1 as required by the electrical supply company. In addition, the relocation of this front boundary to the south ensures a 7m wide road carriageway which is a requirement of the original DA approval; and

4.   Proposes to allow access to the end corner lot being Lot 220 from either Pennant Lane or Horizons Parkway.

 

 

A previous modification application was approved on 8 July 2014 for Lot 219 to become two (2) proposed Lots 219 and 220 also. This is not proposed to change and any new dwellings proposed on these two (2) lots (as shown below), will be the subject of a separate DA to be lodged with Council. The Applicant has confirmed that they intend to act on this component of the application previously approved to create the two lots. Any new DA for dwellings on either Lot 219 or 220 will also be required to be notified separately unless they are Complying Development or single storey.

 

 

There have been several other modification applications approved under this DA to amend the design of individual dwellings. The original application was approved by Council on 20 December 2010. An extract of the overall plan approved is shown below:

 

 

Application Chronology

 

·    16 November 2017 – Modification application lodged with Council;

·    29 November to 12 December 2017 – Neighbour notification of modification proposal.

·    29 November 2017 – Additional information requested – concerns with previous approval consistency eastern end.

·    24 January 2018 – Additional information and amended plans received.

 

3.       STATUTORY ASSESSMENT

 

Is the proposal substantially the same?

 

Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 enables the modification of consents and categorises modifications into three categories - S.96(1) for modifications involving minor error, mis-description or miscalculation; S.96(1A) for modifications involving minimal environmental impact; and S.96(2) for other modifications. Each type of modification must be considered as being substantially the same to that which was originally consented to.

 

The subject application is being considered under the provisions of Section 96(1A).

 

The proposal is considered to be substantially the same development to that which was originally lodged and consented to and will have minimal environmental impact when making a comparison between the original and proposed modified proposal. In particular, the main changes occur to the design of dwellings on Lot 213 to 217 and the minor change to the northern boundary of Lot 213 to 219 (associated with the Pennant Lane).

 

Having regard to the above, the proposed modification is not considered to alter the fundamental essence of the original development and is considered within the scope of a modification application.

 

Are there any condition(s) of consent imposed by a Minister, government or public authority that require modification?

 

No changes to any conditions imposed by a Minister, government or public authority.

Does the application require notification/advertising in accordance with the regulations and/or any Development Control Plan?

 

Neighbour notification has been undertaken in accordance with the DCP.

 

Any submissions made concerning the modification?

 

Three (3) written submissions were received following public exhibition via neighbour notification of the application.

 

The issues raised in the submissions received have been forwarded to the Applicant during the assessment of the DA to respond to.

 

Key issues raised in the submissions received and comments in response to the issues are provided as follows:

 

Submission Issue/Summary

Planning Comment/Response

Objects to dwelling design for Lots 218, 219 and 220.

The dwelling design for Lot 218 is no longer proposed to be altered as part of the application and the proposed dwellings have been deleted from Lots 219 and 220. Any future development on these lots will be subject to further application.

Loss of sunlight / solar access issues from dwellings being higher than Nos. 76, 78 and 80 Crestwood Drive.

 

As the lots are sited to the north and due to the topography of the subject Pennant Lane sites being above the Crestwood Drive sites, there will be overshadowing experienced from any development. By making a comparison to the current original approved dwellings to the proposed modification there is minimal difference in the impacts.

Lot 219 is now proposed to be two lots rather than a dual occupancy.

 

The original submission proposed to alter the dual occupancy lot into two separate lots. However, during the assessment it was identified that two (2) lots were approved in this location with no buildings. The buildings on Lot 219 and 220 (as shown on plan extract earlier in this report) have been deleted from this application. A separate new DA will be required to be lodged for these two (2) lots. Any new DA for dwellings on either Lot 219 or 220 will also be required to be notified separately unless they are Complying Development or single storey.  

No details of boundary fencing to be installed.

Boundary fencing is a matter under the Dividing Fences Act and is normally between the two relevant owners. However in this case, it is recommended that a condition be imposed to require installation of a minimum 1.5m high fence on the southern boundary of the lots prior to issue of an Occupation Certificate. The fence will provide additional privacy to the neighbours to the south.

Current drainage issues, which will be made worse and impact on stability of No. 80 Crestwood Drive.

Drainage is required for each lot, which will improve the current situation of uncontrolled overland flow as there is no development on these lots as yet. Roof water for each dwelling when constructed will need to be connected to the existing inter-allotment stormwater system currently installed on-site.

Amenity impacts including loss of privacy, overlooking and overshadowing to No. 80 Crestwood Drive from the proposed dwelling on Lot 217.

 

Lot 217 (originally Lot 139) was approved as a single-storey dwelling with an elevated rear floor level. This modification still remains as a single storey dwelling with similar levels and height. The floor level of this dwelling is also set lower than the Pennant Lane, which provides access to the site. It should be noted however that a two storey dwelling could be accommodated within the height limit.

A comparison of the proposed dwelling on Lot 217 reveals that the rear setback has been increased from 2.255m to 4.01m as proposed by this modification. The footprint of the dwelling is also marginally smaller and the alfresco area has been moved to the eastern side of the dwelling rather than closer to the southern boundary.

All of these changes increase the privacy for both the future residents and the neighbours to the south and reduces any likely amenity impacts, including overshadowing impacts. There is also an additional condition recommended for a minimum 1.5m height boundary fence to improve privacy.

 

Any matters referred to in section 79C (1) relevant to the modification?

 

Overall, the proposed development remains consistent with the original s79C assessment. Areas of the original assessment impacted by the changes or with revised comments are outlined below:

 

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

 

Satisfactory BASIX certificates were submitted with the original application.

 

A revised BASIX certificate hasn’t been submitted for the revised modified dwelling designs proposed demonstrating that the revised proposal will comply with the requirements of the SEPP.  It is recommended that an additional new condition be imposed to ensure that the commitments are incorporated into the development and certified at Occupation Certificate stage.

 

Port Macquarie-Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2001

 

The above LEP was in place at the original time of assessment and determination of this DA.

 

The subject section of the original development site was zoned 2(a1) residential under this LEP. The subject dwellings and community title subdivision component remain permissible.

 

(iii)    any Development Control Plan in force:

 

Development Control Plan No.9 – Residential and Tourist Development

 

The above DCP was in place at the original time of assessment and determination of this DA.

 

The following table provides a checklist against the applicable controls which need only to be revisited. It is important to note that internal amenity issues within the cluster housing development are not strictly required by the development control provisions in place at the time of the original approval. Any issues would be the subject of a merit assessment unless a new separate DA is lodged for a new dwelling on any of the lots within the community title subdivision lots ie. Lots 219 and 220.

 

DCP 9 - Residential and Tourist Development

Development Provisions

Proposed

Complies

2.2 Max 6m height limit – upper-most ceiling from ground level at any point on the site

Lot 213 dwelling = 5.14m

Lot 214 dwelling = 5.14m

Lot 215 dwelling = 5.18m

Lot 216 dwelling = 5.14m

Lot 217 dwelling = 5.77m

Yes – all comply

-              2.3 Front setbacks 4.5m

The front setback controls for the subject dwellings do not apply as the setback is to a private laneway only. A 5.5m setback is achieved within the driveways, which is desired under the more current planning controls – DCP 2013.

N/A

2.3 Side and rear setbacks

Internal amenity issues within the cluster housing development as originally approved are not strictly subject to the development control provisions in place at the time.

It is noted however that all dwellings have a rear internal southern setback of minimum 4m or more, which would comply with more current planning controls – DCP 2013.

N/A

2.5 Private open space minimum 35m2 area inclusive of 4x4m useable area

35m² of greater with useable area achieved for all modified dwellings.

Yes

 

Other issues of merit impact from the original assessment that have been revisited due to the modification are listed below:

 

Roads

Relocation of the northern boundary of Lots 213 – 219 to be moved 1m south. This allows for the existing electricity easement to be wholly within the Community Lot 1 as required by the electrical supply company. In addition, the relocation of this front boundary to the south ensures a 7m wide road carriageway which is a requirement of the original DA approval.

 

The Applicant has modified the subdivision plan during the assessment to require the private road (over common property) to be of similar scale and size required as part of the original consent (3.5m wide one-way driveway within a 7m wide common property.  Based upon this, no changes are required and access is consistent with Condition B(2) of the existing DA consent.

 

Stormwater

Drainage is required for each lot, which will improve the current situation. Roof water for each dwelling when constructed will need to be connected to the existing inter-allotment stormwater system currently installed on-site. No new risks are identified.

 

4.       DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS APPLICABLE

 

Applicable development contributions to each dwelling as modified and/or lot if released first will need to be reassessed/checked at Subdivision Certificate and Construction Certificate stage for each of the dwellings (whichever occurs first).

 

5.       CONCLUSION

 

The application has been assessed in accordance with Section 96 and 79C of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

Issues raised during assessment and public exhibition of the application have been considered in the assessment of the application.

 

The site remains suitable for the proposed development, is not contrary to the public's interest and will not have a significant adverse social, environmental or economic impact. It is recommended that the modification application be approved, subject to the recommended modified conditions of consent provided in the attachment section of this report.

 

 

Attachments

 

1View. DA2010 - 572.11 Plans

2View. DA2017 - 572.11 Recommended Conditions

3View. DA2010 - 572.11 Submission - Gilmour 02122017

4View. DA2010 - 572.11 Submission - Gilmour 22022018

5View. DA2017 - 572.11 Submission - Hoogers

6View. DA2010.572.11 - Submission - Quach & Lo

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


  ATTACHMENT

Development Assessment Panel

14/03/2018